Yair,
I am very well plugged-in to this project and feeding the necessary
information to the weekly Tempest IRC meeting. In fact, since a few weeks
ago, I've made a point of sharing weekly with the Tempest team what I am
doing with the LBaaS team from the Tempest point of view.
Cheers
On Thu, A
ot;
> >
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 2:22:33 PM
> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [LBaaS] LBaaS v2 API syntax
> > additions/changes
> >
> >
> >
> > On 08/25/2014 10:06 PM, Brandon Logan wrote:
> > >>
> > >&
On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 14:22 +0300, John Schwarz wrote:
>
> On 08/25/2014 10:06 PM, Brandon Logan wrote:
> >>
> >> 2. Therefor, there should be some configuration to specifically enable
> >> either version (not both) in case LBaaS is needed. In this case, the
> >> other version is disabled (ie. a R
I would like to add a question to John's list
- Original Message -
> From: "John Schwarz"
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 2:22:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-de
On 08/25/2014 10:06 PM, Brandon Logan wrote:
>>
>> 2. Therefor, there should be some configuration to specifically enable
>> either version (not both) in case LBaaS is needed. In this case, the
>> other version is disabled (ie. a REST query for non-active version
>> should return a "not activated
Hi Clark,
>From my understanding the keystone catalog will not contain endpoints
for neutron extensions. I could see it being allowed but since Neutron
can enable/disable extensions on a whim, there would need to be some
cross project communication between keystone and neutron. I'm sure
there are
Hi John,
Comments in-line
On Sun, 2014-08-24 at 16:37 +0300, John Schwarz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With the ongoing development of LBaaS v2, support for v2 of LBaaS in
> neutronclient is also being developed, as can be seen in [1].
> The current implementation adds a new syntax for v2; Whereas the v1
> s
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014, at 06:37 AM, John Schwarz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With the ongoing development of LBaaS v2, support for v2 of LBaaS in
> neutronclient is also being developed, as can be seen in [1].
> The current implementation adds a new syntax for v2; Whereas the v1
> syntax is 'neutron lb--', th
Hi,
With the ongoing development of LBaaS v2, support for v2 of LBaaS in
neutronclient is also being developed, as can be seen in [1].
The current implementation adds a new syntax for v2; Whereas the v1
syntax is 'neutron lb--', the new v2 syntax is 'neutron
lbaas--'.
We fear that this can lead t
