tack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Date: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 4:52 PM
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
>
no concrete plan has emerged as of yet.
-Ryan
From: Gary Kotton [mailto:gkot...@vmware.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2016 11:36 PM
To: OpenStack List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] BGP support
Hi,
In the M cycle BGP support was added in tree. I have seen specs in the L2 GW
project for this supp
...@vmware.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2016 11:36 PM
To: OpenStack List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] BGP support
Hi,
In the M cycle BGP support was added in tree. I have seen specs in the L2 GW
project for this support too. Are we planning to consolidate the efforts? Will
the BGP code be moved from
ilto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>,
Gary Kotton <gkot...@vmware.com<mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] BGP support
Hi Gary,
The new L2GW spec is [1] comes to enable inter-cloud connection to stretch the
network between the local and the remote cloud
Hi Gary,
The new L2GW spec is [1] comes to enable inter-cloud connection to stretch
the network between the local and the remote clouds using tunnels between
border VTEP devices.
VTEP can be populated manually with remote MAC (optionally) IP entries.
BGP support is a bit orthogonal or may I say
ing another project is just fragmenting things even more
> …
>
> From: Hirofumi Ichihara <ichihara.hirof...@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> Reply-To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Date: Monday, March 28, 2016 at 10:50 AM
> To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists
enStack List
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Monday, March 28, 2016 at 10:50 AM
To: OpenStack List
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron]
Hi Gary,
You can look at the discussion in here[1, 2]
[1]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1560003
[2]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/268726
Thanks,
Hirofumi
On 2016/03/28 15:36, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
In the M cycle BGP support was added in tree. I have seen specs in the
L2 GW
Hi,
In the M cycle BGP support was added in tree. I have seen specs in the L2 GW
project for this support too. Are we planning to consolidate the efforts? Will
the BGP code be moved from the Neutron git to the L2-GW project? Will a new
project be created?
Sorry, a little in the dark here and it
