On 22 May 2014 03:47, Mandeep Dhami dh...@noironetworks.com wrote:
Hi Salvatore:
Comments inline as well
This is a bit obscure to me. I read it as you're hinting the core team or
part of it has double standards.
In that case I would invite you to clarify.
Last week, I had
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:47:16PM EDT, Mandeep Dhami wrote:
The update from Sean seem to suggest to me that we needed blueprints only
if the public API changes, and not for design changes that are internal to
neutron.
There was no statement in my e-mail that made that
suggestion. My e-mail
OK
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Collins, Sean
sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:47:16PM EDT, Mandeep Dhami wrote:
The update from Sean seem to suggest to me that we needed blueprints only
if the public API changes, and not for design changes that are
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 05:18:57PM EDT, Mandeep Dhami wrote:
Renewing the thread, is there a blueprint for this refactoring effort?
In the email thread till now, we have just had an etherpad link. I would
like to get more deeply involved in design/implementation and review of
these changes
Hi Sean:
While the APIs might not be changing*, I suspect that there are significant
design decisions being made**. These changes are probably more significant
than any new feature being discussed. As a community, are we expected to
document these design changes and review these changes as well?
On May 21, 2014, at 10:23 AM, Mandeep Dhami
dh...@noironetworks.commailto:dh...@noironetworks.com wrote:
Hi Sean:
While the APIs might not be changing*, I suspect that there are significant
design decisions being made**. These changes are probably more significant than
any new feature being
Some comments inline,
Salvatore
On 21 May 2014 15:23, Mandeep Dhami dh...@noironetworks.com wrote:
Hi Sean:
While the APIs might not be changing*, I suspect that there are
significant design decisions being made**. These changes are probably more
significant than any new feature being
Hi Salvatore:
Comments inline as well
This is a bit obscure to me. I read it as you're hinting the core team or
part of it has double standards.
In that case I would invite you to clarify.
Last week, I had requested reference to a design document for neutron
refactoring work. As this
Renewing the thread, is there a blueprint for this refactoring effort?
In the email thread till now, we have just had an etherpad link. I would
like to get more deeply involved in design/implementation and review of
these changes and I get a feeling that not being able to attend the Atlanta
Hi Mandeep,
You can find discussion/details in the etherpad link[1].
[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refactoring-the-neutron-core
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
(m) +1 408.966.2214
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Mandeep Dhami dh...@noironetworks.comwrote:
Hi:
I am not at the conference this
Thanks for the link, Fawad. I had actually seen the etherpad, but I was
hoping that there was a design document backing it up.
Regards,
Mandeep
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Fawad Khaliq fa...@plumgrid.com wrote:
Hi Mandeep,
You can find discussion/details in the etherpad link[1].
[1]
11 matches
Mail list logo
