2014-06-10 at 13:22 -0700, Stephen Balukoff wrote:
>> > >> > Yep, I'd like to know here, too-- as knowing the answer
>> > to this
>> > >> > unblocks implementation work for us.
>> > >> >
&g
>> >
> >> > On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 15:28 +, Buraschi,
> Andres wrote:
> >> > > Thanks, Kyle. Great.
> >> > >
> >> > > -Original Message-
> >> >
gt;> > on this
> >> > yet?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Brandon
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 15:28 +, Buraschi, Andres wrote:
> >> > > Thanks, Kyle. G
i, Andres wrote:
>> > > >> Hi Brandon, hi Kyle!
>> > > >> I'm a bit confused about the deprecation (btw, thanks for
>> > sending this Brandon!), as I (wrongly) assumed #1 would be the
>> > chosen path for t
be the
> > chosen path for the new API implementation. I understand the
> > proposal and #2 sounds actually cleaner.
> > > >>
> > > >> Just out of curiosity, Kyle, where is LBaaS functionality
> > intended to e
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 11:27 AM
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
> questions)
> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Implementing new
> LBaaS API
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 4, 2
#2 sounds actually
> cleaner.
> > >>
> > >> Just out of curiosity, Kyle, where is LBaaS functionality intended to
> end up, if long-term plans are to remove it from Neutron?
> > >>
> > >> (Nit question, I must clarify)
> > >>
> >
es wrote:
> > Thanks, Kyle. Great.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mest...@noironetworks.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 11:27 AM
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Subject: Re: [ope
une 05, 2014 11:27 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Implementing new LBaaS API
>
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Brandon Logan
> wrote:
> > Hi Andres,
> > I've assumed (and we
Thanks, Kyle. Great.
-Original Message-
From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mest...@noironetworks.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 11:27 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Implementing new LBaaS API
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at
functionality intended to end
>> up, if long-term plans are to remove it from Neutron?
>>
>> (Nit question, I must clarify)
>>
>> Thank you!
>> Andres
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Brandon Logan [mailto:brandon.lo...@rackspace.com]
>
k-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Implementing new LBaaS API
Hi Andres,
I've assumed (and we know how assumptions work) that the deprecation would take
place in Juno and after a cyle or two it would totally be removed from the
code. Even if #1 is the way to g
ce.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 2:18 PM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Implementing new LBaaS API
>
> Thanks for your feedback Kyle. I will be at that meeting on Monday.
>
> Thanks,
> Brandon
>
> On Wed, 2
bject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Implementing new LBaaS API
Thanks for your feedback Kyle. I will be at that meeting on Monday.
Thanks,
Brandon
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 11:54 -0500, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Brandon Logan
> wrote:
> > This is an LBaaS t
Thanks for your feedback Kyle. I will be at that meeting on Monday.
Thanks,
Brandon
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 11:54 -0500, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Brandon Logan
> wrote:
> > This is an LBaaS topic bud I'd like to get some Neutron Core members to
> > give their opinions
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Brandon Logan
wrote:
> This is an LBaaS topic bud I'd like to get some Neutron Core members to
> give their opinions on this matter so I've just directed this to Neutron
> proper.
>
> The design for the new API and object model for LBaaS needs to be locked
> down be
This is an LBaaS topic bud I'd like to get some Neutron Core members to
give their opinions on this matter so I've just directed this to Neutron
proper.
The design for the new API and object model for LBaaS needs to be locked
down before the hackathon in a couple of weeks and there are some
questi
17 matches
Mail list logo
