Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] MultiTenant support for VLAN-Aware-VM

2016-07-13 Thread Armando M.
On 13 July 2016 at 16:51, Kevin Benton wrote: > Sub ports are just regular ports from a logical model perspective, right? > If so, there should be no problem attaching the port to a shared network or > RBAC granted network. > True, but I don't believe it until I test it :) On

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] MultiTenant support for VLAN-Aware-VM

2016-07-13 Thread Kevin Benton
Sub ports are just regular ports from a logical model perspective, right? If so, there should be no problem attaching the port to a shared network or RBAC granted network. On Jul 13, 2016 7:15 PM, "Armando M." wrote: > > > On 13 July 2016 at 15:32, Cathy Zhang

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] MultiTenant support for VLAN-Aware-VM

2016-07-13 Thread Armando M.
On 13 July 2016 at 15:32, Cathy Zhang wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > We have been discussing on multi-tenant VNF for service chain on the OVN > mailing alias. > We are thinking about leveraging the vlan-aware-VM for supporting this. > > AFAIK, with current nova, we cannot

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] MultiTenant support for VLAN-Aware-VM

2016-07-13 Thread Cathy Zhang
Hi Everyone, We have been discussing on multi-tenant VNF for service chain on the OVN mailing alias. We are thinking about leveraging the vlan-aware-VM for supporting this. AFAIK, with current nova, we cannot create a multi-tenant VNF. Currently, nova checks whether the neutron port belongs