Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Newton blueprints call for action

Sukhdev Kapur <sukhdevka...@gmail.com> > Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 7:33 AM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Newton blueprints call for action > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > C

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Newton blueprints call for action

Forwarded message -- > From: Sukhdev Kapur <sukhdevka...@gmail.com <mailto:sukhdevka...@gmail.com>> > Date: Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 7:33 AM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Newton blueprints call for action > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing Li

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Newton blueprints call for action

Hi Rossella, Good to hear that you will follow through with this. Ironic is looking for this API as well for bare metal deployments. We would love to work with you to make sure that this API/Implementation works for all servers ( VMs as well BMs) Thanks -Sukhdev On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:32 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Newton blueprints call for action

Folks, thanks to everyone who has replied to the the thread. Much appreciated it. I'll reach out individually to figure out next steps and come back here to provide a status update. Cheers, Armando On 6 April 2016 at 07:17, Brent Eagles wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Newton blueprints call for action

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Armando, On 05/04/16 01:13 AM, Armando M. wrote: > Hi Neutrinos, > > During today's team meeting [0], we went through the current > milestone workload [1]. > > This is mostly made of Mitaka backlog items, amongst which we > discussed two

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Newton blueprints call for action

On 04/05/2016 05:43 AM, Armando M. wrote: > > With this email I would like to appeal to the people in CC to report > back their interest in continuing working on these items in their > respective capacities, and/or the wider community, in case new owners > need to be identified. > > I look

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Newton blueprints call for action

Armando M. wrote: > I would like to understand if these need new owners (both assignees and > approvers). Code submitted [5,6] has not been touched in a while, and > whilst I appreciate people have been busy focussing on Mitaka (myself > included), the Newton master branch has been open for a

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Newton blueprints call for action

Hi Neutrinos, During today's team meeting [0], we went through the current milestone workload [1]. This is mostly made of Mitaka backlog items, amongst which we discussed two blueprints [2, 3]. These two efforts had their spec approved during the Mitaka timeframe, but code lagged behind, and