Thanks, John for your comments. I've added a few comments inline.
In summary, I'm inclined to move forward with this as an admin-only
operation to begin with. I'll give another day or two for someone new
to take notice.
Carl
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 7:56 AM, John Davidge
Resurrecting this thread from last week.
On 5/31/16, 10:11 PM, "Brian Haley" wrote:
>> At this point the enumeration values map simply to device owners. For
>>example:
>>
>>router_ports -> "network:router_gateway"
>>dvr_fip_ports ->
Thanks Carl for bringing this up, comments below.
On 05/26/2016 02:04 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote:
Hi folks,
Some (but not all) of you will remember a discussion we had about
service subnets at the last mid-cycle. We've been iterating a little
bit on a spec [1] and we have just one issue that we'd
Hi folks,
Some (but not all) of you will remember a discussion we had about
service subnets at the last mid-cycle. We've been iterating a little
bit on a spec [1] and we have just one issue that we'd like to get a
little bit more feedback on.
As a summary: To me, the idea of this spec is to