Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-06-17 Thread Zang MingJie
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: Hi Zang Since, SSL-VPN for Juno bp is approved in neturon-spec, I would like to restart this work. Could you share your code if it is possible? Also, Let's discuss how we can collaborate in here. Currently We are running

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-05-29 Thread Clark, Robert Graham
To: openstack-dev Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation Excerpts from Nachi Ueno's message of 2014-05-01 12:04:23 -0700: Ah I got it now! so even if we get stolen HDD, we can keep password safe. However, I'm still not sure why this is more secure.. anyway, the ID/PW

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-05-28 Thread Nachi Ueno
From: Clint Byrum [cl...@fewbar.com] Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 2:22 PM To: openstack-dev Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation Excerpts from Nachi Ueno's message of 2014-05-01 12:04:23 -0700: Ah I got it now! so even if we get stolen HDD, we can keep

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-05-01 Thread Jarret Raim
Zang mentioned that part of the issue is that the private key has to be stored in the OpenVPN config file. If the config files are generated and can be stored, then storing the whole config file in Barbican protects the private key (and any other settings) without having to try to deliver the key

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-05-01 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi Jarret IMO, Zang point is the issue saving plain private key in the filesystem for OpenVPN. Isn't this same even if we use Barbican? 2014-05-01 2:56 GMT-07:00 Jarret Raim jarret.r...@rackspace.com: Zang mentioned that part of the issue is that the private key has to be stored in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-05-01 Thread Clark, Robert Graham
issues. -Original Message- From: Nachi Ueno [mailto:na...@ntti3.com] Sent: 01 May 2014 17:36 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation Hi Jarret IMO, Zang point is the issue saving plain private

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-05-01 Thread Nachi Ueno
2014 17:36 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation Hi Jarret IMO, Zang point is the issue saving plain private key in the filesystem for OpenVPN. Isn't this same even if we use Barbican? 2014-05-01

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-05-01 Thread Clint Byrum
filesystem disk-residency issues. -Original Message- From: Nachi Ueno [mailto:na...@ntti3.com] Sent: 01 May 2014 17:36 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation Hi Jarret IMO, Zang

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-05-01 Thread Nachi Ueno
List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation Hi Jarret IMO, Zang point is the issue saving plain private key in the filesystem for OpenVPN. Isn't this same even if we use Barbican? 2014-05-01 2:56 GMT-07:00 Jarret Raim

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-05-01 Thread Clint Byrum
-residency issues. -Original Message- From: Nachi Ueno [mailto:na...@ntti3.com] Sent: 01 May 2014 17:36 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation Hi Jarret IMO, Zang point

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-05-01 Thread John Wood
-dev Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation Excerpts from Nachi Ueno's message of 2014-05-01 12:04:23 -0700: Ah I got it now! so even if we get stolen HDD, we can keep password safe. However, I'm still not sure why this is more secure.. anyway, the ID/PW to access

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-05-01 Thread Nachi Ueno
From: Clint Byrum [cl...@fewbar.com] Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 2:22 PM To: openstack-dev Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation Excerpts from Nachi Ueno's message of 2014-05-01 12:04:23 -0700: Ah I got it now! so even if we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-04-30 Thread Jarret Raim
As the PTL for Barbican, I¹m happy to discuss this more here or at the Summit. Not sure if this is an option, but could you store the entire OpenVPN config file in Barbican rather than just the key? Not sure if you are generating those on demand or not, but we¹ve had several teams inside

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-04-30 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: Hi Clint Thank you for your suggestion. Your point get taken :) Kyle This is also a same discussion for LBaaS Can we discuss this in advanced service meeting? Yes! I think we should definitely discuss this in the advanced

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-04-30 Thread Nachi Ueno
Jarret Thanks! Currently, the config will be generated on demand by the agent. What's merit storing entire config in the Barbican? Kyle Thanks! 2014-04-30 7:05 GMT-07:00 Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com: On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: Hi Clint

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-04-29 Thread Zang MingJie
Hi all: Currently I'm working on ssl vpn, based on patchsets by Nachi[1] and Rajesh[2] There are secure issues pointed by mark, that ssl private keys are stored plain in database and in config files of vpn-agents. As Barbican is incubated, we can store certs and their private keys in Barbican.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-04-29 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi Zang Thank you for your contribution on this! The private key management is what I want to discuss in the summit. [1] We are depending DB security, anyway When we get stolen the private key in the DB, it means we are also stolen ID/PW for DB. If we stolen the key, even if we keep the private

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-04-29 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: Hi Zang Thank you for your contribution on this! The private key management is what I want to discuss in the summit. Has the idea of using Barbican been discussed before? There are many reasons why using Barbican for this may

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-04-29 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi Kyle 2014-04-29 10:52 GMT-07:00 Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com: On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: Hi Zang Thank you for your contribution on this! The private key management is what I want to discuss in the summit. Has the idea of using Barbican

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-04-29 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: Hi Kyle 2014-04-29 10:52 GMT-07:00 Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com: On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: Hi Zang Thank you for your contribution on this! The private key management is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-04-29 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Nachi Ueno's message of 2014-04-29 10:58:53 -0700: Hi Kyle 2014-04-29 10:52 GMT-07:00 Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com: On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: Hi Zang Thank you for your contribution on this! The private key management

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-04-29 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi Clint Thank you for your suggestion. Your point get taken :) Kyle This is also a same discussion for LBaaS Can we discuss this in advanced service meeting? Zang Could you join the discussion? 2014-04-29 15:48 GMT-07:00 Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com: Excerpts from Nachi Ueno's message of