Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Nova + Glance_v2 = Love

2016-01-11 Thread Mikhail Fedosin
Sam, Flavio, Zhenyu, Daniel thank you for your responses! Indeed, we're in a difficult position with activating zero-size images... To fix it we have to solve 2 problems: one with disk and container formats parameters - glance v2 doesn't allow activate images if these two are unset; and the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Nova + Glance_v2 = Love

2016-01-08 Thread Sam Matzek
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Sam Matzek wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: >> On 29/12/15 07:41 -0600, Sam Matzek wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Mikhail Fedosin >>> wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Nova + Glance_v2 = Love

2016-01-08 Thread Sam Matzek
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 29/12/15 07:41 -0600, Sam Matzek wrote: >> >> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Mikhail Fedosin >> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, it's another topic about glance v2 adoption in Nova, but it's >>> different

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Nova + Glance_v2 = Love

2016-01-08 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 24/12/15 16:49 +0300, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: Hello, it's another topic about glance v2 adoption in Nova, but it's different from the others. I want to declare that there is a set of commits, that make Nova version agnostic and allow to work with both glance apis. The idea of the solution is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Nova + Glance_v2 = Love

2016-01-08 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 29/12/15 07:41 -0600, Sam Matzek wrote: On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: Hello, it's another topic about glance v2 adoption in Nova, but it's different from the others. I want to declare that there is a set of commits, that make Nova version

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Nova + Glance_v2 = Love

2016-01-08 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 10:01:45AM -0430, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 29/12/15 07:41 -0600, Sam Matzek wrote: > >On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Mikhail Fedosin > >wrote: > >>Hello, it's another topic about glance v2 adoption in Nova, but it's > >>different from the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Nova + Glance_v2 = Love

2016-01-08 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 08/01/16 14:45 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 10:01:45AM -0430, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 29/12/15 07:41 -0600, Sam Matzek wrote: >On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: >>Hello, it's another topic about glance v2 adoption in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Nova + Glance_v2 = Love

2016-01-04 Thread Zhenyu Zheng
Agreed with Sam, the point 6 is actually very important now for production deployment, as volume-backed instance is very common. Maybe we should keep it until we find a better solution. On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Sam Matzek wrote: > On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 7:49 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Nova + Glance_v2 = Love

2015-12-29 Thread Sam Matzek
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > Hello, it's another topic about glance v2 adoption in Nova, but it's > different from the others. I want to declare that there is a set of commits, > that make Nova version agnostic and allow to work with both glance

[openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Nova + Glance_v2 = Love

2015-12-24 Thread Mikhail Fedosin
Hello, it's another topic about glance v2 adoption in Nova, but it's different from the others. I want to declare that there is a set of commits, that make Nova version agnostic and allow to work with both glance apis. The idea of the solution is to determine the current api version in the