On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Jordan Pittier
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>
>> On 04/08/2015 11:22 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
>> > + [Cinder] and [Tempest] in the $subject since this affects them too
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 4:22 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> >
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/08/2015 11:22 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
> > + [Cinder] and [Tempest] in the $subject since this affects them too
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 4:22 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/08/2015 12:01 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Qu
On 04/08/2015 11:22 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
> + [Cinder] and [Tempest] in the $subject since this affects them too
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 4:22 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>
>> On 04/08/2015 12:01 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
>>>
>>> Questions:
>>>
>>> 1) Is this a valid scenario being tested ? Some s
+ [Cinder] and [Tempest] in the $subject since this affects them too
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 4:22 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/08/2015 12:01 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
> >
> > Questions:
> >
> > 1) Is this a valid scenario being tested ? Some say yes, I am not sure,
> > since the test makes sure t
