Le 24/07/2014 02:11, Michael Still a écrit :
In that case this exception is approved. The exception is in the form
of another week to get the spec merged, so quick iterations are the
key.
Cheers,
Michael
Thanks Michael, greatly appreciated.
-Sylvain
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 5:31 PM,
Le 23/07/2014 01:11, Michael Still a écrit :
This spec freeze exception only has one core signed up. Are there any
other cores interested in working with Sylvain on this one?
Michael
By looking at
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-juno-spec-priorities, I can see
ndipanov as volunteer for
In that case this exception is approved. The exception is in the form
of another week to get the spec merged, so quick iterations are the
key.
Cheers,
Michael
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Sylvain Bauza sba...@redhat.com wrote:
Le 23/07/2014 01:11, Michael Still a écrit :
This spec freeze
This spec freeze exception only has one core signed up. Are there any
other cores interested in working with Sylvain on this one?
Michael
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 7:59 PM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote:
On 18 July 2014 09:10, Sylvain Bauza sba...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi team,
I would
On 18 July 2014 09:10, Sylvain Bauza sba...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi team,
I would like to put your attention on https://review.openstack.org/89893
This spec targets to isolate access within the filters to only Scheduler
bits. This one is a prerequisite for a possible split of the scheduler
into
Hi team,
I would like to put your attention on https://review.openstack.org/89893
This spec targets to isolate access within the filters to only Scheduler
bits. This one is a prerequisite for a possible split of the scheduler
into a separate project named Gantt, as it's necessary to remove direct
