On Fri, Jul 19 2013, Sean Dague wrote:
I assume it would gracefully degrade to the existing static allocators if
something went wrong. If not, well that would be very bad.
Ceilometer is an integrated project in Havana. Utilization based scheduling
would be a new feature. I'm not sure why we
Sandy Walsh wrote on 2013-07-19:
On 07/19/2013 09:47 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: 19 July 2013 12:04
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Ceilometer vs. Nova internal metrics
On 07/19/2013 06:18 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
Ceilometer is a great project for taking metrics available in Nova and other
systems and making them available for use by Operations, Billing, Monitoring,
etc - and clearly we should try and avoid having multiple collectors of the
same data.
But
done it. Which way do you think
that should be done?
Paul.
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: 19 July 2013 12:04
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Ceilometer vs. Nova internal metrics
collector for scheduling
] Ceilometer vs. Nova internal metrics
collector for scheduling (was: New DB column or new DB table?)
On 07/19/2013 06:18 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
Ceilometer is a great project for taking metrics available in Nova and other
systems and making them available for use by Operations, Billing, Monitoring,
etc
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: 19 July 2013 12:04
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Ceilometer vs. Nova internal metrics
collector for scheduling (was: New DB column or new DB table?)
On 07/19/2013 06:18
On 07/19/2013 08:30 AM, Andrew Laski wrote:
On 07/19/13 at 12:08pm, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud Services) wrote:
Hi Sean,
Do you think the existing static allocators should be migrated to
going through ceilometer - or do you see that as different? Ignoring
backward compatibility.
It makes sense
[mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: 19 July 2013 14:28
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Ceilometer vs. Nova internal metrics
collector for scheduling
On 07/19/2013 08:30 AM, Andrew Laski wrote:
On 07/19/13 at 12:08pm, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud Services) wrote:
Hi Sean
On 07/19/2013 12:30 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/19/2013 10:37 AM, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud Services) wrote:
If we agree that something like capabilities should go through Nova,
what do you suggest should be done with the change that sparked this
debate: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/35760/
