Ok, let's skip the meeting this week so people can have a break.
Cheers,
Michael
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 3:45 AM, melanie witt wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2014, at 17:01, Michael Still wrote:
>
>> Hi. The meeting this week would be on the 3rd of July, which I assume
>> means that many people will be out
On Jun 29, 2014, at 17:01, Michael Still wrote:
> Hi. The meeting this week would be on the 3rd of July, which I assume
> means that many people will be out of the office. Do people think its
> worth running the meeting or shall we give this week a miss?
July 3 is a company holiday where I am, s
On 6/30/2014 8:30 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Jun 30, 2014 9:23 AM, "Andrew Laski" mailto:andrew.la...@rackspace.com>> wrote:
>
>
> On 06/29/2014 08:01 PM, Michael Still wrote:
>>
>> Hi. The meeting this week would be on the 3rd of July, which I assume
>> means that many people will be out
On Jun 30, 2014 9:23 AM, "Andrew Laski" wrote:
>
>
> On 06/29/2014 08:01 PM, Michael Still wrote:
>>
>> Hi. The meeting this week would be on the 3rd of July, which I assume
>> means that many people will be out of the office. Do people think its
>> worth running the meeting or shall we give this
On 06/29/2014 08:01 PM, Michael Still wrote:
Hi. The meeting this week would be on the 3rd of July, which I assume
means that many people will be out of the office. Do people think its
worth running the meeting or shall we give this week a miss?
I will be traveling during the meeting so I'm +1
Hi. The meeting this week would be on the 3rd of July, which I assume
means that many people will be out of the office. Do people think its
worth running the meeting or shall we give this week a miss?
Thanks,
Michael
--
Rackspace Australia
___
OpenSta
