On 25 July 2016 at 13:56, Bhor, Dinesh <dinesh.b...@nttdata.com> wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 5:53 PM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Remov
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 08:22:52AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 07/25/2016 08:05 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 07:57:08AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> >> On 07/22/2016 11:30 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 07:03:53AM -0700, Matt Riedemann
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 5:53 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Remove duplicate code using Data Driven
Tests (DDT)
On 07/25/2016 08:05 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon,
On 07/25/2016 08:05 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 07:57:08AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
>> On 07/22/2016 11:30 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 07:03:53AM -0700, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 7/21/2016 2:03 AM, Bhor, Dinesh wrote:
I agree
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 07:57:08AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 07/22/2016 11:30 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 07:03:53AM -0700, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> >> On 7/21/2016 2:03 AM, Bhor, Dinesh wrote:
> >>
> >> I agree that it's not a bug. I also agree that it helps in
On 07/25/2016 07:57 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/22/2016 11:30 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 07:03:53AM -0700, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 7/21/2016 2:03 AM, Bhor, Dinesh wrote:
I agree that it's not a bug. I also agree that it helps in some specific
types of tests which
On 07/22/2016 11:30 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 07:03:53AM -0700, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> On 7/21/2016 2:03 AM, Bhor, Dinesh wrote:
>>
>> I agree that it's not a bug. I also agree that it helps in some specific
>> types of tests which are doing some kind of input
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 07:03:53AM -0700, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 7/21/2016 2:03 AM, Bhor, Dinesh wrote:
> > Hi Nova Devs,
> >
> >
> >
> > Many times, there are a number of data sets that we have to run the same
> > tests on.
> >
> > And, to create a different test for each data set values
On 7/21/2016 2:03 AM, Bhor, Dinesh wrote:
Hi Nova Devs,
Many times, there are a number of data sets that we have to run the same
tests on.
And, to create a different test for each data set values is
time-consuming and inefficient.
Data Driven Testing [1] overcomes this issue. Data-driven
Hi Dinesh Bhor,
I could see a lot of projects have used this. Seems interesting.
You can refer Cinder, for example.
I think we should not raise bug for this. For me it's invalid.
You can treat this as improvement(just to reduce test code blocks), it
seems ok to go ahead even without any BP or
Hi Nova Devs,
Many times, there are a number of data sets that we have to run the same tests
on.
And, to create a different test for each data set values is time-consuming and
inefficient.
Data Driven Testing [1] overcomes this issue. Data-driven testing (DDT) is
taking a test,
parameterizing
11 matches
Mail list logo
