: 27/08/2013 10:48 PM
Subject:[openstack-dev] [Nova] multiple-scheduler-drivers
blueprint
Greetings,
One of the important things to strive for in our community is consensus.
When there's not consensus, we should take a step back and see if we
need to change directions.
There has been
,
Alex
From:Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
To:OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date:27/08/2013 10:48 PM
Subject:[openstack-dev] [Nova] multiple-scheduler-drivers
blueprint
--
Greetings
duplicating all the filters if this can
be done with a single flag?
Regards,
Alex
From: Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 28/08/2013 09:32 PM
Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] multiple-scheduler-drivers
To:OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date:28/08/2013 09:32 PM
Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] multiple-scheduler-drivers
blueprint
--
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Alex Glikson
*glik...@il.ibm.com*glik
Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote on 28/08/2013 11:04:45 PM:
Well, first, at the moment each of these filters today duplicate the
code that handles aggregate-based overrides. So, it would make sense
to have it in one place anyway. Second, why duplicating all the
filters if this can be
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Alex Glikson glik...@il.ibm.com wrote:
Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote on 28/08/2013 11:04:45 PM:
Well, first, at the moment each of these filters today duplicate the
code that handles aggregate-based overrides. So, it would make sense
to have it in
Greetings,
One of the important things to strive for in our community is consensus.
When there's not consensus, we should take a step back and see if we
need to change directions.
There has been a lot of iterating on this feature, and I'm afraid we
still don't have consensus around the design.
