On 05/24/2016 11:54 AM, Dan Smith wrote:
>> I like the idea of checking the md5 matches before each boot, as it
>> mirrors the check we do after downloading from glance. Its possible
>> thats very unlikely to spot anything that shouldn't already be worried
>> about by something else. It may just be
> I like the idea of checking the md5 matches before each boot, as it
> mirrors the check we do after downloading from glance. Its possible
> thats very unlikely to spot anything that shouldn't already be worried
> about by something else. It may just be my love of symmetry that makes
> me like tha
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Fichter, Dane G.
wrote:
> Hi John and Matt,
>
> I actually have a spec and patch up for review addressing some of what
> you’re referring to below.
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/314222/
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/312210/
>
> I think you’re quite rig
.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org>"
mailto:openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Is verification of
images in the image cache necessary?
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:06 AM, John Garbutt
mailto:j.
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:06 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
> On 24 May 2016 at 10:16, Matthew Booth wrote:
> > During its periodic task, ImageCacheManager does a checksum of every
> image
> > in the cache. It verifies this checksum against a previously stored
> value,
> > or creates that value if it
On 24 May 2016 at 10:16, Matthew Booth wrote:
> During its periodic task, ImageCacheManager does a checksum of every image
> in the cache. It verifies this checksum against a previously stored value,
> or creates that value if it doesn't already exist.[1] Based on this
> information it generates a
