On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 08:00:07PM -0400, Luigi Toscano wrote:
> No one said that there will be other backports, at this time. It would have
> made sense if the reviews would have been merged when they have been
> proposed. It would be nice thought to backports one or two other patches for
> the
- Original Message -
> On 03/19/2016 01:43 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 12:15:23PM +, Amrith Kumar wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Sorry for the blast mail, this is targeted at the stable-maint team. The
> >> following five changes are now ready to merge. Two of them
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 09:53:41AM -0400, Amrith Kumar wrote:
> On 03/19/2016 01:43 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> > Did I misunderstand what these reviews are doing?
> Tony, your understanding is correct. These requests led to a lot of
> discussion and the fact that these are non-voting experimental
On 03/19/2016 01:43 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 12:15:23PM +, Amrith Kumar wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry for the blast mail, this is targeted at the stable-maint team. The
>> following five changes are now ready to merge. Two of them are changes
>> proposed by the bot and
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 12:15:23PM +, Amrith Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for the blast mail, this is targeted at the stable-maint team. The
> following five changes are now ready to merge. Two of them are changes
> proposed by the bot and three of them are clearly identified as cherry-picks
Hi,
Sorry for the blast mail, this is targeted at the stable-maint team. The
following five changes are now ready to merge. Two of them are changes proposed
by the bot and three of them are clearly identified as cherry-picks from
changes that went into master.
