Re: [openstack-dev] [Release] [FFE] two xstatic packages to be bumped in upper-constraints, please

2016-09-13 Thread Swapnil Kulkarni (coolsvap)
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 6:09 AM, Richard Jones wrote: > Hi folks, > > We have two patches to upper-constraints up that we'd like to see merged for > Newton. The package updates in question only changed meta-data, but they did > so in a way that fixes issues for downstream,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release] [FFE] two xstatic packages to be bumped in upper-constraints, please

2016-09-13 Thread Dirk Müller
Am 13.09.2016 05:03 schrieb "Tony Breeds" : > > The reviews are: > > > > update constraint for XStatic-Bootstrap-SCSS to new release 3.3.7.1 > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/368970/ > > > > update constraint for XStatic-smart-table to new release 1.4.13.2 > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release] [FFE] two xstatic packages to be bumped in upper-constraints, please

2016-09-12 Thread Tony Breeds
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:39:24AM +1000, Richard Jones wrote: > Hi folks, > > We have two patches to upper-constraints up that we'd like to see merged > for Newton. The package updates in question only changed meta-data, but > they did so in a way that fixes issues for downstream, and it makes

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release] [FFE] two xstatic packages to be bumped in upper-constraints, please

2016-09-12 Thread Matthew Thode
On 09/12/2016 07:39 PM, Richard Jones wrote: > Hi folks, > > We have two patches to upper-constraints up that we'd like to see merged > for Newton. The package updates in question only changed meta-data, but > they did so in a way that fixes issues for downstream, and it makes > sense to keep

[openstack-dev] [Release] [FFE] two xstatic packages to be bumped in upper-constraints, please

2016-09-12 Thread Richard Jones
Hi folks, We have two patches to upper-constraints up that we'd like to see merged for Newton. The package updates in question only changed meta-data, but they did so in a way that fixes issues for downstream, and it makes sense to keep upper-constraints in line with what they'll be packaging.