Feel free to add your name to the wiki :)
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Alex Xu wrote:
> ++, I also want to join this party :)
>
> 2018-01-09 8:40 GMT+08:00 Zhipeng Huang :
>
>> Agree 100% to avoid regular meeting and it is better to have bi-weekly
>> email report. Meeting should be arranged
++, I also want to join this party :)
2018-01-09 8:40 GMT+08:00 Zhipeng Huang :
> Agree 100% to avoid regular meeting and it is better to have bi-weekly
> email report. Meeting should be arranged event based, and I think given the
> status of OpenStack community's work on resource provider, mostl
application filed at
https://review.openstack.org/534342 and wiki created at
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Res_Mgmt_SIG .
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 12:51 AM, Zhipeng Huang
wrote:
> i think I could do it, but I gotta rely on you guys to attend the Resource
> Management WG meeting since its time
i think I could do it, but I gotta rely on you guys to attend the Resource
Management WG meeting since its time is really bad for us in APAC timezone
:P
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 6:30 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
> I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even
On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Jay Pipes wrote:
I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if we're
talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events in the
resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular meetings for a
resource management SIG, I'm +0 on
Zhipeng Huang wrote:
> [...]
> With the maturing of resource provider/placement feature landing in
> OpenStack in recent release, and also in light of Kubernetes community
> increasing attention to the similar effort, I want to propose to form a
> Resource Management SIG as a contact point for Open
Hi Eric,
Glad to count you in :)
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 4:57 AM, Eric Fried wrote:
> > I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if
> > we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events
> > in the resource tracking world would be useful. As far as
Agree 100% to avoid regular meeting and it is better to have bi-weekly
email report. Meeting should be arranged event based, and I think given the
status of OpenStack community's work on resource provider, mostly what we
need to do is attend k8s meetings (sig-scheduler, wg-resource-management,
etc.
> I think having a bi-weekly cross-project (or even cross-ecosystem if
> we're talking about OpenStack+k8s) status email reporting any big events
> in the resource tracking world would be useful. As far as regular
> meetings for a resource management SIG, I'm +0 on that. I prefer to have
> targeted
On 01/08/2018 12:26 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote:
Hi all,
With the maturing of resource provider/placement feature landing in
OpenStack in recent release, and also in light of Kubernetes community
increasing attention to the similar effort, I want to propose to form a
Resource Management SIG as a
Hi all,
With the maturing of resource provider/placement feature landing in
OpenStack in recent release, and also in light of Kubernetes community
increasing attention to the similar effort, I want to propose to form a
Resource Management SIG as a contact point for OpenStack community to
communica
11 matches
Mail list logo