I'd like to suggest that we take a step back and identify the actual
requirement(s) we're trying address, independent of the actual implementation
(current or otherwise). Once that requirement is clearly stated, we can think
of viable approaches and then, lastly, how the current architecture
Hi, Andrew
Agreed with your opinion. Initially Savanna’s templates approach is the option
1 you are talking about.
This was designed at the start of Savanna 0.2 release cycle. It was also
documented here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Savanna/Templates .
Maybe some points are outdated but
I strongly agree that we should try to keep templates as flexible as
possible by allowing some values to be omitted and provided at a later
time. But, in this case, we are talking about cluster templates without
any node groups being specified. I think that at a minimum a cluster
template would
John,
I think we should either select one of the listed border approaches (no
validation or full validation) or define some strict rules on what is
allowed and what is not. Otherwise phrases like at a minimum a cluster
template would contain node groups is a speculation and we will not be
able to
