On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda
noo...@noorul.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/08/2014 11:40 AM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote:
On Jan 8, 2014 9:58 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com
On 01/07/2014 11:27 PM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote:
Should we rather revert patch to make gate working?
I think it is always good to have test packages reside in
test-requirements.txt. So -1
On Jan 8, 2014 6:11 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/07/2014 11:27 PM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote:
Should we rather revert patch to make gate working?
I think it is always good
On 01/08/2014 09:26 AM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote:
On Jan 8, 2014 6:11 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/07/2014 11:27 PM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda
noo...@noorul.com wrote:
On Jan 8, 2014 6:11 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/07/2014 11:27 PM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org writes:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda
noo...@noorul.com wrote:
On Jan 8, 2014 6:11 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/07/2014 11:27 PM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Georgy
Hi,
I do understand why there is a push back for this patch. This patch is for
infrastructure project which works for multiple projects. Infra maintainers
should not know specifics of each project in details. If this patch is a
temporary solution then who will be responsible to remove it?
If we
On Jan 8, 2014 9:58 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi,
I do understand why there is a push back for this patch. This patch is
for infrastructure project which works for multiple projects. Infra
maintainers should not know specifics of each project in details. If
On 01/08/2014 11:40 AM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote:
On Jan 8, 2014 9:58 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com mailto:gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi,
I do understand why there is a push back for this patch. This patch is
for infrastructure project which
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/08/2014 11:40 AM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote:
On Jan 8, 2014 9:58 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com mailto:gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi,
I do understand why there is a push back
Hi team,
After merging [1] devstack gate started failing. There is already a
thread [2] related to this in mailing list. Until this gets fixed
shall we make this job non-voting?
Regards,
Noorul
[1] https://review.openstack.org/64226
[2]
I'm ok with making this non-voting for Solum until this gets fixed.
-Murali
On Jan 7, 2014, at 8:53 PM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda noo...@noorul.com
wrote:
Hi team,
After merging [1] devstack gate started failing. There is already a
thread [2] related to this in mailing list. Until
Should we rather revert patch to make gate working?
Thanks
Georgy
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Murali Allada
murali.all...@rackspace.comwrote:
I'm ok with making this non-voting for Solum until this gets fixed.
-Murali
On Jan 7, 2014, at 8:53 PM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote:
Should we rather revert patch to make gate working?
I think it is always good to have test packages reside in
test-requirements.txt. So -1 on reverting that patch.
Here [1] is a temporary solution.
14 matches
Mail list logo
