I've been slowly working on building out and adding to the documentation
about how to do things, but I can make that my top priority so that you all
have a little more guidance. I'll try to get some patches out in the next
week or so.
Storyboard seems complicated but I think most of the mental
On 6/8/2018 1:03 PM, Jay S Bryant wrote:
Helps if I include the link to the video:
https://www.openstack.org/videos/boston-2017/storyboard-101-survival-guide-to-the-great-migration
Hope that helps.
Yeah I linked to that in my original email - that's about the migration,
not usage. I want
On 6/7/2018 5:48 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 6/7/2018 3:25 PM, Kendall Nelson wrote:
I know it doesn't fit the shiny user facing docket that was discussed
at the Forum, but I do think its time we make migration official in
some capacity as a release goal or some other way. Having migrated
On 6/7/2018 5:48 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 6/7/2018 3:25 PM, Kendall Nelson wrote:
I know it doesn't fit the shiny user facing docket that was discussed
at the Forum, but I do think its time we make migration official in
some capacity as a release goal or some other way. Having migrated
Sean McGinnis 於 2018年6月5日 週二 上午2:07寫道：
>
> Python 3 First
> ==
>
> One of the things brought up in the session was picking things that bring
> excitement and are obvious benefits to deployers and users of OpenStack
> services. While this one is maybe not as immediately obvious, I
Matt Riedemann 於 2018年6月8日 週五 上午6:49寫道：
> I haven't used it much, but it would be really nice if someone could
> record a modern 'how to storyboard' video for just basic usage/flows
> since most people are used to launchpad by now so dealing with an
> entirely new task tracker is not trivial (or
Kendall Nelson 於 2018年6月8日 週五 上午4:26寫道：
>
> I think that these two goals definitely fit the criteria we discussed in
Vancouver during the S Release Goal Forum Session. I know Storyboard
Migration was also mentioned after I had to dip out to another session so I
wanted to follow up on that.
>
+1.
On 6/7/2018 3:25 PM, Kendall Nelson wrote:
I know it doesn't fit the shiny user facing docket that was discussed at
the Forum, but I do think its time we make migration official in some
capacity as a release goal or some other way. Having migrated Ironic and
having TripleO on the schedule for
On 2018-06-07 14:19:41 -0700 (-0700), Clark Boylan wrote:
[...]
> We stopped following latest Ubuntu when they dropped non LTS
> support to 9 months. What we do have are suse tumbleweed images
> which should get us brand new everything in a rolling fashion. If
> people are interested in this type
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018, at 1:53 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 06/04/2018 08:59 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
> > I hope we'll have Ubuntu 18.04 LTS on our gates for this activity soon.
> > It becomes
> > important not only for developers but for operators and vendors too.
>
> By the time the project
On 06/04/2018 08:59 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
> I hope we'll have Ubuntu 18.04 LTS on our gates for this activity soon.
> It becomes
> important not only for developers but for operators and vendors too.
By the time the project will be gating on Python 3.6, most likely
there's going to be 3.7
Hello :)
I think that these two goals definitely fit the criteria we discussed in
Vancouver during the S Release Goal Forum Session. I know Storyboard
Migration was also mentioned after I had to dip out to another session so I
wanted to follow up on that.
I know it doesn't fit the shiny user
On 06/07/2018 09:39 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 6/5/2018 9:14 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
In the past when we've had questions about how broadly a goal is going
to affect projects, we did a little data collection work up front. Maybe
that's the next step for this one? Does someone want to
On 6/5/2018 9:14 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
In the past when we've had questions about how broadly a goal is going
to affect projects, we did a little data collection work up front. Maybe
that's the next step for this one? Does someone want to volunteer to go
around and talk to some of the project
Excerpts from Sean McGinnis's message of 2018-06-05 07:26:27 -0500:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 06:44:15PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> > On 6/4/2018 5:13 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> > > Yes, exactly what I meant by the NOOP. I'm not sure what Cinder would
> > > check here. We don't have to see if
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 06:44:15PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 6/4/2018 5:13 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> > Yes, exactly what I meant by the NOOP. I'm not sure what Cinder would
> > check here. We don't have to see if placement has been set up or if cell0
> > has been configured. Maybe once we
On 6/4/2018 5:13 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
Yes, exactly what I meant by the NOOP. I'm not sure what Cinder would
check here. We don't have to see if placement has been set up or if cell0
has been configured. Maybe once we have the facility in place we would
find some things worth checking, but at
Adding back the openstack-operators list that Matt added.
On 06/04/2018 05:13 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
On 06/04/2018 04:17 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2018-06-04 15:38:48 -0500:
On 6/4/2018 1:07 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
Python 3 First
==
On 06/04/2018 04:17 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2018-06-04 15:38:48 -0500:
On 6/4/2018 1:07 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
Python 3 First
==
One of the things brought up in the session was picking things that bring
excitement and are obvious
Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2018-06-04 15:38:48 -0500:
> On 6/4/2018 1:07 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> > Python 3 First
> > ==
> >
> > One of the things brought up in the session was picking things that bring
> > excitement and are obvious benefits to deployers and users
+openstack-operators since we need to have more operator feedback in our
community-wide goals decisions.
+Melvin as my elected user committee person for the same reasons as
adding operators into the discussion.
On 6/4/2018 3:38 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 6/4/2018 1:07 PM, Sean McGinnis
On 6/4/2018 1:07 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
Python 3 First
==
One of the things brought up in the session was picking things that bring
excitement and are obvious benefits to deployers and users of OpenStack
services. While this one is maybe not as immediately obvious, I think this
is
Hi Sean,
These goals look reasonable for me.
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 9:07 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> This is to continue the discussion of the goal selection for the Stein
> release.
> I had previously sent out a recap of our discussion at the Forum here:
>
>
Hi everyone,
This is to continue the discussion of the goal selection for the Stein release.
I had previously sent out a recap of our discussion at the Forum here:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-May/130999.html
Now we need to actually narrow things down and pick a
24 matches
Mail list logo
