On 16.5.2016 23:54, Pradeep Kilambi wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 3:33 PM, James Slagle
wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote:
Hi Everyone:
I wanted to start a discussion around considering backporting Aodh to
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:31 PM, James Slagle
wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote:
> > Thanks Steve. I was under the impression we cannot run puppet at this
> > stage. Hence my suggestion to run bash or some script here, but
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote:
> Thanks Steve. I was under the impression we cannot run puppet at this
> stage. Hence my suggestion to run bash or some script here, but if we
> can find a way to easily wire the existing aodh puppet manifests into
> the
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:59 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> Hi Pradeep,
>
> Firstly, as discussed on IRC, I echo all of bnemec's concerns, this is not
> well aligned with our stable branch policy[1], or the stable-maint
> direction towards "critical bugfixes only"[2], so if possible
Hi Pradeep,
Firstly, as discussed on IRC, I echo all of bnemec's concerns, this is not
well aligned with our stable branch policy[1], or the stable-maint
direction towards "critical bugfixes only"[2], so if possible I'd rather we
figured out a general way to solve this problem that doesn't
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 3:33 PM, James Slagle
wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote:
> > Hi Everyone:
> >
> > I wanted to start a discussion around considering backporting Aodh to
> > stable/liberty for upgrades. We have been
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote:
> Hi Everyone:
>
> I wanted to start a discussion around considering backporting Aodh to
> stable/liberty for upgrades. We have been discussing quite a bit on whats
> the best way for our users to upgrade ceilometer alarms
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> From what I've seen of the IRC discussion it sounds like we're doing
> this, but can we at least agree that it is a bad way to handle service
> replacement?
>
> First, we are completely replacing a service on a minor
>From what I've seen of the IRC discussion it sounds like we're doing
this, but can we at least agree that it is a bad way to handle service
replacement?
First, we are completely replacing a service on a minor upgrade, which
even if it is a 100% compatible drop-in replacement may have
Hi Everyone:
I wanted to start a discussion around considering backporting Aodh to
stable/liberty for upgrades. We have been discussing quite a bit on whats
the best way for our users to upgrade ceilometer alarms to Aodh when moving
from liberty to mitaka. A quick refresh on what changed, In
10 matches
Mail list logo