Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Aodh upgrades - Request backport exception for stable/liberty

2016-05-18 Thread Jiří Stránský
On 16.5.2016 23:54, Pradeep Kilambi wrote: On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 3:33 PM, James Slagle wrote: On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote: Hi Everyone: I wanted to start a discussion around considering backporting Aodh to

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Aodh upgrades - Request backport exception for stable/liberty

2016-05-17 Thread Pradeep Kilambi
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:31 PM, James Slagle wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote: > > Thanks Steve. I was under the impression we cannot run puppet at this > > stage. Hence my suggestion to run bash or some script here, but

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Aodh upgrades - Request backport exception for stable/liberty

2016-05-17 Thread James Slagle
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote: > Thanks Steve. I was under the impression we cannot run puppet at this > stage. Hence my suggestion to run bash or some script here, but if we > can find a way to easily wire the existing aodh puppet manifests into > the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Aodh upgrades - Request backport exception for stable/liberty

2016-05-17 Thread Pradeep Kilambi
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:59 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > Hi Pradeep, > > Firstly, as discussed on IRC, I echo all of bnemec's concerns, this is not > well aligned with our stable branch policy[1], or the stable-maint > direction towards "critical bugfixes only"[2], so if possible

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Aodh upgrades - Request backport exception for stable/liberty

2016-05-17 Thread Steven Hardy
Hi Pradeep, Firstly, as discussed on IRC, I echo all of bnemec's concerns, this is not well aligned with our stable branch policy[1], or the stable-maint direction towards "critical bugfixes only"[2], so if possible I'd rather we figured out a general way to solve this problem that doesn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Aodh upgrades - Request backport exception for stable/liberty

2016-05-16 Thread Pradeep Kilambi
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 3:33 PM, James Slagle wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote: > > Hi Everyone: > > > > I wanted to start a discussion around considering backporting Aodh to > > stable/liberty for upgrades. We have been

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Aodh upgrades - Request backport exception for stable/liberty

2016-05-16 Thread James Slagle
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > I wanted to start a discussion around considering backporting Aodh to > stable/liberty for upgrades. We have been discussing quite a bit on whats > the best way for our users to upgrade ceilometer alarms

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Aodh upgrades - Request backport exception for stable/liberty

2016-05-16 Thread Pradeep Kilambi
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > From what I've seen of the IRC discussion it sounds like we're doing > this, but can we at least agree that it is a bad way to handle service > replacement? > > First, we are completely replacing a service on a minor

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Aodh upgrades - Request backport exception for stable/liberty

2016-05-16 Thread Ben Nemec
>From what I've seen of the IRC discussion it sounds like we're doing this, but can we at least agree that it is a bad way to handle service replacement? First, we are completely replacing a service on a minor upgrade, which even if it is a 100% compatible drop-in replacement may have

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Aodh upgrades - Request backport exception for stable/liberty

2016-05-16 Thread Pradeep Kilambi
Hi Everyone: I wanted to start a discussion around considering backporting Aodh to stable/liberty for upgrades. We have been discussing quite a bit on whats the best way for our users to upgrade ceilometer alarms to Aodh when moving from liberty to mitaka. A quick refresh on what changed, In