Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Docker and TripleO

2014-01-16 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/01/01 03:35, Robert Collins wrote: So, we've spoken about using containers on baremetal - e.g. the lxc provider - in the past, and with the [righteously deserved] noise Docker is receiving, I think we need to have a short expectation-setting discussion. Previously we've said that deployi

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Docker and TripleO

2014-01-02 Thread Robert Collins
> > No argument here. I agree that it's an optimization and you know what they > say about premature optimization. :-) > > I do wonder whether the ongoing discussion about where container support > should live in OpenStack is relevant to this as well. Or would we not > intend to manage the Triple

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Docker and TripleO

2014-01-02 Thread Ben Nemec
On 2013-12-31 20:35, Robert Collins wrote: So, we've spoken about using containers on baremetal - e.g. the lxc provider - in the past, and with the [righteously deserved] noise Docker is receiving, I think we need to have a short expectation-setting discussion. Previously we've said that deployi

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Docker and TripleO

2013-12-31 Thread Robert Collins
So, we've spoken about using containers on baremetal - e.g. the lxc provider - in the past, and with the [righteously deserved] noise Docker is receiving, I think we need to have a short expectation-setting discussion. Previously we've said that deploying machines to deploy containers to deploy Op