On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:57 AM, James Slagle
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> >
> > While I cannot speak for the dynamics of the tripleo team, if this were
> to
> > be adopted in nova I would not +2 any blueprints as I don't think I can
> > commit to *guaranteeing*
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
> While I cannot speak for the dynamics of the tripleo team, if this were to
> be adopted in nova I would not +2 any blueprints as I don't think I can
> commit to *guaranteeing* I will have even more review bandwidth, I can make
> best efforts b
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 09:31:48PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote:
>> Hey everybody - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/SpecReviews
>> seems pretty sane as we discussed at the last TripleO IRC meeting.
>>
>> I'd like to propose that
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 09:31:48PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote:
> > Hey everybody - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/SpecReviews
> > seems pretty sane as we discussed at the last TripleO IRC meeting.
> >
> > I'd like to propose t
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 09:31:48PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote:
> Hey everybody - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/SpecReviews
> seems pretty sane as we discussed at the last TripleO IRC meeting.
>
> I'd like to propose that we adopt it with the following tweak:
>
> 19:46:34 so I propose
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 09:31:48PM +1200, Robert Collins wrote:
> Hey everybody - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/SpecReviews
> seems pretty sane as we discussed at the last TripleO IRC meeting.
>
> I'd like to propose that we adopt it with the following tweak:
>
> 19:46:34 so I propose
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> Hey everybody - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/SpecReviews
> seems pretty sane as we discussed at the last TripleO IRC meeting.
>
> I'd like to propose that we adopt it with the following tweak:
>
> 19:46:34 so I propose that +2 on
Hey everybody - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/SpecReviews
seems pretty sane as we discussed at the last TripleO IRC meeting.
I'd like to propose that we adopt it with the following tweak:
19:46:34 so I propose that +2 on a spec is a commitment to
review it over-and-above the core revie
