Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Emilien Macchi >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 3:30 AM, James Slagle

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 3:30 AM, James Slagle > wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Emilien Macchi

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 3:30 AM, James Slagle wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Dan Prince

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:07 PM, James Slagle wrote: > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > Yes. Thanks for reformulate with better words. > > Just to be clear, I want to transform the scenarios into single-node > > jobs that

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Yes. Thanks for reformulate with better words. > Just to be clear, I want to transform the scenarios into single-node > jobs that deploy the SAME services (using composable services) from > the undercloud, using the new

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 3:30 AM, James Slagle wrote: > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Dan Prince wrote: >> [...] >> >>> -CI resources: better use of CI resources. At the PTG

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Dan Prince wrote: > [...] > >> -CI resources: better use of CI resources. At the PTG we received >> feedback from the OpenStack infrastructure team that our upstream

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

I took an action to remove scenarios/baremetal jobs on pike/master: https://review.openstack.org/518210 I think it's a good step forward cleaning things up and saving CI resources. I also think we should keep one multinode/baremetal job on pike (and probably ovb), and kill all baremetal jobs in

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 7:35 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: >> >> On 11/6/17 1:01 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Dan Prince wrote: >>> [...]

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 7:35 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > On 11/6/17 1:01 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Dan Prince wrote: >> [...] >> >> -CI resources: better use of CI resources. At the PTG we received >>> feedback from

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 4:35 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > On 11/6/17 1:01 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Dan Prince wrote: >> [...] >> >>> -CI resources: better use of CI resources. At the PTG we received >>> feedback

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On 11/6/17 1:01 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Dan Prince wrote: [...] -CI resources: better use of CI resources. At the PTG we received feedback from the OpenStack infrastructure team that our upstream CI resource usage is quite high at times

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Dan Prince wrote: > [...] > > > -CI resources: better use of CI resources. At the PTG we received > > feedback from the OpenStack infrastructure team that our

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Dan Prince wrote: [...] > -CI resources: better use of CI resources. At the PTG we received > feedback from the OpenStack infrastructure team that our upstream CI > resource usage is quite high at times (even as high as 50% of the > total).

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

út 17. 10. 2017 v 17:14 odesílatel Dan Prince napsal: > On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 11:46 +, milanisko k wrote: > > > > How about the shared container? Wouldn't it be better not have to > > rely on t-h-t especially if we're "scheduling" (and probably > > configuring) the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 11:46 +, milanisko k wrote: > > How about the shared container? Wouldn't it be better not have to > rely on t-h-t especially if we're "scheduling" (and probably > configuring) the services as a single logical entity? The containers architecture for Pike and Queens is

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

út 17. 10. 2017 v 13:06 odesílatel Dan Prince napsal: > On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 10:06 +, milanisko k wrote: > > > > Does it mean dnsmasq was run from a stand-alone container? > > Yes. There are separate containers for the ironic-inspector and > dnsmasq. > > > > > Could you

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 10:06 +, milanisko k wrote: > > Does it mean dnsmasq was run from a stand-alone container? Yes. There are separate containers for the ironic-inspector and dnsmasq. > > Could you please point me (in the patch probably) to the spot where > we configure inspector

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

Hi Dan! thanks for the testing! I've got couple of questions... po 16. 10. 2017 v 20:04 odesílatel Dan Prince napsal: > On Wed, 2017-10-04 at 15:10 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > > (top-posting, as it is not a direct response to a specific line) > > > > This is your

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Wed, 2017-10-04 at 15:10 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > (top-posting, as it is not a direct response to a specific line) > > This is your friendly reminder that we're not quite near > containerized > ironic-inspector. The THT for it has probably never been tested at > all, and the > iptables

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On 10/3/17 10:46 PM, Dan Prince wrote: > > > This reduces our complexity greatly I think in that once it is completed > will allow us to eliminate two project (instack and instack-undercloud) > and the maintenance thereof. Furthermore, as this dovetails nice with > the Ansible >   > >  IMHO

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

[dpri...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2017 9:50 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Dmitry Tantsur <dtant...@redhat.com<mailto:dtant...@redh

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > (top-posting, as it is not a direct response to a specific line) > > This is your friendly reminder that we're not quite near containerized > ironic-inspector. The THT for it has probably never been tested at all, and >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Dan Prince wrote: > On Tue, 2017-10-03 at 16:03 -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Dan Prince >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Alex Schultz >> > wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

(top-posting, as it is not a direct response to a specific line) This is your friendly reminder that we're not quite near containerized ironic-inspector. The THT for it has probably never been tested at all, and the iptables magic we do may simply not be containers-compatible. Milan would

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Tue, 2017-10-03 at 16:03 -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Dan Prince > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Alex Schultz > > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Dan Prince

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Dan Prince wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Dan Prince wrote: >> > On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 15:20 -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: >> >> Hey

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Dan Prince wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 15:20 -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > >> Hey Dan, > >> > >> Thanks for sending out a note about this. I have a few questions >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Dan Prince wrote: >> On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 15:20 -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: >>> Hey Dan, >>> >>> Thanks for sending out a note about this. I have a few questions >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Dan Prince wrote: > On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 15:20 -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: >> Hey Dan, >> >> Thanks for sending out a note about this. I have a few questions >> inline. >> >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 6:02 AM, Dan Prince >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Dan Prince wrote: [...] > I would let other chime in but the feedback I've gotten has mostly been > that it improves the dev/test cycle greatly. [...] I like both aschultz & dprince thoughts here, I agree with both of you on most of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 15:20 -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > Hey Dan, > > Thanks for sending out a note about this. I have a few questions > inline. > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 6:02 AM, Dan Prince > wrote: > > One of the things the TripleO containers team is planning on > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

Hey Dan, Thanks for sending out a note about this. I have a few questions inline. On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 6:02 AM, Dan Prince wrote: > One of the things the TripleO containers team is planning on tackling > in Queens is fully containerizing the undercloud. At the PTG we

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

One of the things the TripleO containers team is planning on tackling in Queens is fully containerizing the undercloud. At the PTG we created an etherpad [1] that contains a list of features that need to be implemented to fully replace instack-undercloud. Benefits of this work: -Alignment: