This has been actioned. Welcome!
-Rob
On 8 April 2014 11:50, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdon
On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jones c...@tenshu.net wrote:
Hi
+1 for your proposed -core changes.
Re your question
On 08/04/14 01:50, Robert Collins wrote:
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdon
-1, there's a typo in jdob's nick ;-)
In all seriousness, I support all of them being added to core.
On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jones c...@tenshu.net wrote:
Hi
+1 for your
+1 for the -core changes
jdon sounds like a pretty cool Mafia name, +1 for Don Jay
On 04/08/2014 09:10 AM, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
On 08/04/14 01:50, Robert Collins wrote:
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdon
-1, there's a typo in jdob's nick ;-)
In all seriousness, I
On 2014/08/04 01:50, Robert Collins wrote:
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdon
jdon - jdob
+1 for all the folks.
-- Jarda
On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jones c...@tenshu.net wrote:
Hi
+1 for your proposed -core changes.
Re your question about whether we should
On 2014/03/04 13:02, Robert Collins wrote:
Getting back in the swing of things...
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
Hi
+1
Cheers,
--
Chris Jones
On 8 Apr 2014, at 00:50, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdon
On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jones c...@tenshu.net wrote:
Hi
+1 for your proposed -core changes.
Re your
On 04/08/2014 01:50 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdon
+1
Imre
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 08/04/14 00:50, Robert Collins wrote:
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdon
+1 for all
On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jones c...@tenshu.net wrote:
Hi
+1 for your proposed -core changes.
Re your question about whether we should retroactively apply the
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdob
+1 to all. I've valued the feedback from these individuals as both
fellow reviewers and on my submitted patches.
--
-- James Slagle
--
On 04/08/2014 01:50 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdon
+1 to all
Jan
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On 04/07/2014 07:50 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdon
I'm comfortable with committing to at least 3 reviews a day and promise
to wield the awesome power of +2 responsibly. I appreciate being
nominated :)
On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014, at 12:30 PM, Jay Dobies wrote:
On 04/07/2014 07:50 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdon
I'm comfortable with committing to at least 3 reviews a day and promise
to wield the awesome power of +2 responsibly. I
On 04/08/2014 02:47 PM, Gregory Haynes wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014, at 12:30 PM, Jay Dobies wrote:
On 04/07/2014 07:50 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdon
I'm comfortable with committing to at least 3 reviews a day and promise
to wield the
- Original Message -
From: Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2014 7:50:57 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] reviewer update march [additional
On 08/04/14 02:50, Robert Collins wrote:
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdon
+1
On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jones c...@tenshu.net wrote:
Hi
+1 for your proposed -core changes.
Re your question about whether we should retroactively apply the 3-a-day
rule
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdon
On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jones c...@tenshu.net wrote:
Hi
+1 for your proposed -core changes.
Re your question about whether we should retroactively apply the 3-a-day
rule to the 3 month review stats, my suggestion would be a
+1 for the -core changes
On 04/08/2014 01:50 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdon
On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jones c...@tenshu.net wrote:
Hi
+1 for your proposed -core changes.
Re your question about whether we should retroactively
+1
On 04/03/2014 01:02 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
Getting back in the swing of things...
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be
On 03/04/14 14:02, Robert Collins wrote:
Getting back in the swing of things...
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
On 04/03/2014 01:02 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
Getting back in the swing of things...
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
On 3.4.2014 13:02, Robert Collins wrote:
Getting back in the swing of things...
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
with
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2014-04-03 04:02:20 -0700:
Getting back in the swing of things...
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing
On 04/03/2014 01:02 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
Getting back in the swing of things...
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
Getting back in the swing of things...
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
with -core responsibilities.
In this months
On 04/04/14 00:02 +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
Getting back in the swing of things...
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
On 03/04/14 13:02, Robert Collins wrote:
Getting back in the swing of things...
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
Hi
+1 for your proposed -core changes.
Re your question about whether we should retroactively apply the 3-a-day
rule to the 3 month review stats, my suggestion would be a qualified no.
I think we've established an agile approach to the member list of -core, so
if there are a one or two people
On 03/04/14 12:02, Robert Collins wrote:
Getting back in the swing of things...
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
28 matches
Mail list logo