Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] spec-lite process for tripleo

2017-03-30 Thread Ben Nemec
On 03/28/2017 11:09 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: Bringing an old topic on the table. We might have noticed: 1. Some tripleo-specs take huge amount of time before getting merged (or even reviewed). We have been asking folks to review them every week but unfortunately they don't get much

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] spec-lite process for tripleo

2017-03-30 Thread Luke Hinds
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:42 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:09:43PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > Bringing an old topic on the table. > > > > We might have noticed: > > > > 1. Some tripleo-specs take huge amount of time before getting merged > > (or

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] spec-lite process for tripleo

2017-03-29 Thread Steven Hardy
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:09:43PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Bringing an old topic on the table. > > We might have noticed: > > 1. Some tripleo-specs take huge amount of time before getting merged > (or even reviewed). We have been asking folks to review them every > week but unfortunately

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] spec-lite process for tripleo

2017-03-28 Thread Emilien Macchi
Bringing an old topic on the table. We might have noticed: 1. Some tripleo-specs take huge amount of time before getting merged (or even reviewed). We have been asking folks to review them every week but unfortunately they don't get much attraction (# of core reviewers versus # of folks actually

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] spec-lite process for tripleo

2016-01-29 Thread Dougal Matthews
On 27 January 2016 at 16:21, Derek Higgins wrote: > Hi All, > > We briefly discussed feature tracking in this weeks tripleo meeting. I > would like to provide a way for downstream consumers (and ourselves) to > track new features as they get implemented. The main things that

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] spec-lite process for tripleo

2016-01-28 Thread Steven Hardy
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 08:01:31PM -0700, Jason Rist wrote: > On 01/27/2016 09:21 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > We briefly discussed feature tracking in this weeks tripleo meeting. I > > would like to provide a way for downstream consumers (and ourselves) to > > track new features

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] spec-lite process for tripleo

2016-01-27 Thread Jason Rist
On 01/27/2016 09:21 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: > Hi All, > > We briefly discussed feature tracking in this weeks tripleo meeting. I > would like to provide a way for downstream consumers (and ourselves) to > track new features as they get implemented. The main things that came > out of the

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] spec-lite process for tripleo

2016-01-27 Thread Derek Higgins
Hi All, We briefly discussed feature tracking in this weeks tripleo meeting. I would like to provide a way for downstream consumers (and ourselves) to track new features as they get implemented. The main things that came out of the discussion is that people liked the spec-lite process that

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] spec-lite process for tripleo

2016-01-27 Thread Dan Prince
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 16:21 +, Derek Higgins wrote: > Hi All, > > We briefly discussed feature tracking in this weeks tripleo meeting. > I  > would like to provide a way for downstream consumers (and ourselves) > to  > track new features as they get implemented. The main things that > came  >