we'll learn from the PoC.
Would you like to help with this?
Cheers,
Flavio
Thanks and Best Regards,
Ildikó
-Original Message-
From: Clint Byrum [mailto:cl...@fewbar.com]
Sent: May 27, 2015 18:42
To: openstack-dev
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar][all] Zaqar will stay... Lots of work
On 28/05/15 16:48 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 05/27/2015 05:08 PM, Hayes, Graham wrote:
It was agreed that Zaqar would look at a oslo_messaging driver for the
services that did not agree with the 3 options presented.
Another option there would be to add amqp 1.0 support to zaqar, and
then
On 27/05/15 11:19 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2015-05-27 10:40:48 -0700:
On 27/05/15 12:42, Clint Byrum wrote:
== Crazy idea section ==
One thing I never had a chance to discuss with any of the Zaqar devs that
I would find interesting is an email-only
On 06/01/2015 04:34 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 31/05/15 18:12 +, Ildikó Váncsa wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to ask about the user-facing notifications part of the
list. Do you have a roadmap for this? Is this driven by the Zaqar
team? What are the next steps?
Hey,
This will
: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar][all] Zaqar will stay... Lots of work
ahead
On 06/01/2015 04:34 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 31/05/15 18:12 +, Ildikó Váncsa wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to ask about the user-facing notifications part of the
list. Do you have a roadmap for this? Is this driven
There is a spec to get this work started. It's currently a Heat spec:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/186436/
That spec is for defining a basic schema to start with.
-Alex
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 28/05/15 16:48 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
On
, 2015 18:42
To: openstack-dev
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar][all] Zaqar will stay... Lots of work ahead
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2015-05-26 01:28:06 -0700:
Greetings,
TL;DR: Thanks everyone for your feedback. Based on the discussed plans
at the summit - I'll be writing
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar][all] Zaqar will stay... Lots of work ahead
On 05/28/2015 05:14 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
Thats like saying you should implement a sql engine inside of
Berkeley DB since so many folks like sql
On 05/28/2015 05:14 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
Thats like saying you should implement a sql engine inside of
Berkeley DB since so many folks like sql... Not a good fit. If you
want AMQP, get an AMQP server. Zaqar's intentionally lighter weight
then that. Hardly any OpenStack services use but a
On 05/28/2015 07:20 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
I don't know AMQP very well. At the protocol level, are Exchanges, Queues, etc
things? Are fanout, durability, and other things required or optional to be
implemented?
AMQP 1.0 is very different from the pre 1.0 versions. Where 0.8/0.9
focus on
(not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar][all] Zaqar will stay... Lots of work ahead
On 05/27/2015 05:08 PM, Hayes, Graham wrote:
It was agreed that Zaqar would look at a oslo_messaging driver for the
services that did not agree with the 3 options presented.
Another option
On 05/27/2015 05:08 PM, Hayes, Graham wrote:
It was agreed that Zaqar would look at a oslo_messaging driver for the
services that did not agree with the 3 options presented.
Another option there would be to add amqp 1.0 support to zaqar, and then
you could use the amqp 1.0 driver with zaqar
Hi,
Thanks for writing down the summit notes Flavio. I'm really glad that there
are so many great features to work on in this cycle. I'll be there to help
as much as possible with every one of them.
I would also like to add that we will be doing a lot of work in the client
side, updating it to
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2015-05-27 10:40:48 -0700:
On 27/05/15 12:42, Clint Byrum wrote:
== Crazy idea section ==
One thing I never had a chance to discuss with any of the Zaqar devs that
I would find interesting is an email-only backend for Zaqar. Basically
make Zaqar
On 05/26/2015 09:29 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
TL;DR: Thanks everyone for your feedback. Based on the discussed plans
at the summit - I'll be writing more about these later - Zaqar will
stick around and play its role in the community.
Summit Summary
==
I'm happy
On 27/05/15 12:42, Clint Byrum wrote:
== Crazy idea section ==
One thing I never had a chance to discuss with any of the Zaqar devs that
I would find interesting is an email-only backend for Zaqar. Basically
make Zaqar an HTTP-to-email gateway. There are quite a few hyper-scale
options for
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2015-05-26 01:28:06 -0700:
Greetings,
TL;DR: Thanks everyone for your feedback. Based on the discussed plans
at the summit - I'll be writing more about these later - Zaqar will
stick around and play its role in the community.
Summit Summary
Greetings,
TL;DR: Thanks everyone for your feedback. Based on the discussed plans
at the summit - I'll be writing more about these later - Zaqar will
stick around and play its role in the community.
Summit Summary
==
I'm happy to say that several use cases were discussed at the
On 05/26/2015 04:28 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
TL;DR: Thanks everyone for your feedback. Based on the discussed plans
at the summit - I'll be writing more about these later - Zaqar will
stick around and play its role in the community.
\o/
[snip]
==
Next Steps
On 26/05/15 08:23 -0400, Ryan Brown wrote:
On 05/26/2015 04:28 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
[snip]
As a first step, we should restore our meetings and get to work right
away. To favor our contributors in NZ, next week's meeting will be at
21:00 UTC and we'll keep it at that time for 2 weeks.
20 matches
Mail list logo
