Thanks for the awesome feedback :)
I got the point of not using project name, thanks Dean for explaining it so
well. We will move ahead as per Monty's suggestion.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 10/12/2015 07:55 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 5:25 PM,
On 10/12/2015 07:55 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Victoria Martínez de la Cruz
> mailto:victo...@vmartinezdelacruz.com>>
> wrote:
>
> So, this commands would look like
>
> openstack pool-flavor create
> openstack pool-flavor get
> openstack pool-flavor
On 13/10/15 18:27 -0400, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 10/13/2015 05:15 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Shifali Agrawal
mailto:shaifali.agrawa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
All above make sense, just one thing, how about using word "zaqar"
instead of messaging? That is what all
On 10/13/2015 05:15 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Shifali Agrawal
mailto:shaifali.agrawa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
All above make sense, just one thing, how about using word "zaqar"
instead of messaging? That is what all other projects are doing,
for example:
On 14/10/15 10:15, Dean Troyer wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Shifali Agrawal
mailto:shaifali.agrawa...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
All above make sense, just one thing, how about using word "zaqar"
instead of messaging? That is what all other projects are doing,
for example:
Th
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Shifali Agrawal <
shaifali.agrawa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All above make sense, just one thing, how about using word "zaqar"
> instead of messaging? That is what all other projects are doing, for
> example:
>
These are the old project-specific CLIs, note that the
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> On 12/10/15 19:25 -0300, Victoria Martínez de la Cruz wrote:
>
>> HI all,
>>
>> Thanks for your feedback. We discussed this topic in this week weekly
>> meeting
>> and we came to the conclusion that it would be better to use "pool-flavor"
.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 13, 2015 5:28 AM
> *To:* Flavio Percoco; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
> questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar][cli][openstackclient] conflict in
> nova flavor and zaqar flavor
>
> Fair enough, +1 to Flavio's su
usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar][cli][openstackclient] conflict in nova
flavor and zaqar flavor
Fair enough, +1 to Flavio's suggestion
Thanks all,
Victoria
2015-10-13 3:35 GMT-03:00 Flavio Percoco
mailto:fla...@redhat.com>>:
On 12/10/15 19:25 -0300, Victoria Martínez
Fair enough, +1 to Flavio's suggestion
Thanks all,
Victoria
2015-10-13 3:35 GMT-03:00 Flavio Percoco :
> On 12/10/15 19:25 -0300, Victoria Martínez de la Cruz wrote:
>
>> HI all,
>>
>> Thanks for your feedback. We discussed this topic in this week weekly
>> meeting
>> and we came to the conclus
On 12/10/15 19:25 -0300, Victoria Martínez de la Cruz wrote:
HI all,
Thanks for your feedback. We discussed this topic in this week weekly meeting
and we came to the conclusion that it would be better to use "pool-flavor"
instead of creating a namespace for Zaqar only (by prefixing everything wi
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Victoria Martínez de la Cruz <
victo...@vmartinezdelacruz.com> wrote:
> So, this commands would look like
>
> openstack pool-flavor create
> openstack pool-flavor get
> openstack pool-flavor delete
> openstack pool-flavor update
> openstack pool-flavor list
>
I wo
HI all,
Thanks for your feedback. We discussed this topic in this week weekly
meeting and we came to the conclusion that it would be better to use
"pool-flavor" instead of creating a namespace for Zaqar only (by prefixing
everything with the "message" key).
So, this commands would look like
open
All right, thanks for responses, will code accordingly :)
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Steve Martinelli's message of 2015-10-06 16:09:32 -0400:
> >
> > Using `message flavor` works for me, and having two words is just fine.
>
> It might even be good to cha
Excerpts from Steve Martinelli's message of 2015-10-06 16:09:32 -0400:
>
> Using `message flavor` works for me, and having two words is just fine.
It might even be good to change "flavor" to "server flavor" (keeping
flavor as a backwards-compatible alias, of course).
Doug
>
> I'm in the proces
Using `message flavor` works for me, and having two words is just fine.
I'm in the process of collecting all of the existing "object" works are
putting them online, there's a lot of them. Hopefully this will reduce the
collisions in the future.
Thanks,
Steve Martinelli
OpenStack Keystone Core
16 matches
Mail list logo