On 01/30/2015 07:23 AM, Sandy Walsh wrote:
From: Johannes Erdfelt [johan...@erdfelt.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 9:18 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] SQL Schema Downgrades
On 01/29/2015 03:11 PM, Mike Bayer wrote:
Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com wrote:
Are downward migrations really a good idea for us to support? Is this downward
migration path a sane expectation? In the real world, would any one really
trust the data after migrating downwards?
On Friday 30 January 2015 01:01:00 Boris Bobrov wrote:
On Thursday 29 January 2015 22:06:25 Morgan Fainberg wrote:
I’d like to propose we stop setting the expectation that a downwards
migration is a “good idea” or even something we should really support.
Offering upwards-only migrations
From: Johannes Erdfelt [johan...@erdfelt.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 9:18 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] SQL Schema Downgrades and Related Issues
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015
As a quick preface, today there is the assumption you can upgrade and downgrade
your SQL Schema. For the most part we do our best to test all of this in our
unit tests (do upgrades and downgrades land us in the same schema). What isn’t
clearly addressed is that the concept of downgrade might be
On 01/29/2015 11:06 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
As a quick preface, today there is the assumption you can upgrade and
downgrade your SQL Schema. For the most part we do our best to test all of
this in our unit tests (do upgrades and downgrades land us in the same
schema). What isn’t clearly
On Jan 29, 2015, at 2:27 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 01/29/2015 11:06 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
As a quick preface, today there is the assumption you can upgrade and
downgrade your SQL Schema. For the most part we do our best to test all of
this in our unit tests (do
Are downward migrations really a good idea for us to support? Is this
downward migration path a sane expectation? In the real world, would any
one really trust the data after migrating downwards?
are downward migrations actually mandated? i always assumed it was just been a
pain that
On Thursday 29 January 2015 22:06:25 Morgan Fainberg wrote:
I’d like to propose we stop setting the expectation that a downwards
migration is a “good idea” or even something we should really support.
Offering upwards-only migrations would also simplify the migrations in
general. This downward
Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com wrote:
Are downward migrations really a good idea for us to support? Is this
downward migration path a sane expectation? In the real world, would any one
really trust the data after migrating downwards?
It’s a good idea for a migration script to
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015, Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com wrote:
The concept that there is a utility that can (and in many cases
willfully) cause permanent, and in some cases irrevocable, data loss
from a simple command line interface sounds crazy when I try and
explain it to someone.
11 matches
Mail list logo
