Re: [openstack-dev] [api] microversion spec

2016-02-05 Thread Sean Dague
On 02/05/2016 03:00 PM, michael mccune wrote: > On 02/03/2016 10:23 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:49 AM, Sean Dague > > wrote: >> >> I've been looking through the reviews on and where it's gotten to - >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] microversion spec

2016-02-05 Thread michael mccune
On 02/03/2016 10:23 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:49 AM, Sean Dague mailto:s...@dague.net>> wrote: I've been looking through the reviews on and where it's gotten to - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/243429/4/guidelines/microversion_specification.rst A coup

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] microversion spec

2016-02-03 Thread Morgan Fainberg
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:49 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > I've been looking through the reviews on and where it's gotten to - > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/243429/4/guidelines/microversion_specification.rst > > > A couple of questions / concerns. > > There was major push back from API-WG on 'API

[openstack-dev] [api] microversion spec

2016-02-03 Thread Sean Dague
I've been looking through the reviews on and where it's gotten to - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/243429/4/guidelines/microversion_specification.rst A couple of questions / concerns. There was major push back from API-WG on 'API' itself being in the headers. What is the data on what services