Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about workload partition

2017-12-04 Thread gordon chung
On 2017-12-03 10:30 PM, 李田清 wrote: > > > On 2017-12-01 05:03 AM, 李田清 wrote: > >> Hello, > >>       we test workload partition, and find it's much slower than not > >> using it. > >>       After some review, we find that, after get samples from > >> notifications.sample > >>       

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about workload partition

2017-12-03 Thread 李田清
On 2017-12-01 05:03 AM, 李田清 wrote: >> Hello, >> we test workload partition, and find it's much slower than not >> using it. >> After some review, we find that, after get samples from >> notifications.sample >> ceilometer unpacks them and sends them one by one to the pipe >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about workload partition

2017-12-01 Thread gordon chung
On 2017-12-01 05:03 AM, 李田清 wrote: > Hello, >      we test workload partition, and find it's much slower than not > using it. >      After some review, we find that, after get samples from > notifications.sample >      ceilometer unpacks them and sends them one by one to the pipe >      

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about workload partition

2017-12-01 Thread 李田清
Hello, we test workload partition, and find it's much slower than not using it. After some review, we find that, after get samples from notifications.sample ceilometer unpacks them and sends them one by one to the pipe ceilometer.pipe.*, this will make the consumer slow.