Hi Billy
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 at 17:24 Billy Olsen wrote:
> I suspect that the reactive charming model wouldn't have this issue
> due to the ability to essentially statically link the libraries via
> wheels/pip packages. If that's the case, it's likely possible to
> follow along the same lines as
I suspect that the reactive charming model wouldn't have this issue
due to the ability to essentially statically link the libraries via
wheels/pip packages. If that's the case, it's likely possible to
follow along the same lines as the base-layer charm and bootstrap the
environment using pip/wheel
Hi All
Whilst working on the re-licensing of the OpenStack charms to Apache 2.0,
its apparent that syncing and inclusion of the charm-helpers python module
directly into the charm is not going to work from a license compatibility
perspective. charm-helpers is LGPL v3 (which is OK for a runtime dep