On 22 September 2016 at 00:23, John Griffith
wrote:
>
> Yes, that is a sizeable chunk of the solution. The remaining components
> are how to coordinate with Nova (compute nodes) and figuring out if we just
> use c-vol as is, or if we come up with some form of a paired down agent.
> Just using c-
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Michał Dulko
wrote:
> On 09/20/2016 05:48 PM, John Griffith wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Duncan Thomas
> > mailto:duncan.tho...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On 20 September 2016 at 16:24, Nikita Konovalov
> > mailto:nkonova...@mirantis.com>>
On 09/20/2016 05:48 PM, John Griffith wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Duncan Thomas
> mailto:duncan.tho...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On 20 September 2016 at 16:24, Nikita Konovalov
> mailto:nkonova...@mirantis.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> From Sahara (and Hadoop workload
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Duncan Thomas
wrote:
> On 20 September 2016 at 16:24, Nikita Konovalov
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> From Sahara (and Hadoop workload in general) use-case the reason we used
>> BDD was a complete absence of any overhead on compute resources
>> utilization.
>>
>> The re
On 20 September 2016 at 16:24, Nikita Konovalov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From Sahara (and Hadoop workload in general) use-case the reason we used
> BDD was a complete absence of any overhead on compute resources
> utilization.
>
> The results show that the LVM+Local target perform pretty close to BDD in
Hi,
>From Sahara (and Hadoop workload in general) use-case the reason we used
BDD was a complete absence of any overhead on compute resources
utilization.
The results show that the LVM+Local target perform pretty close to BDD in
synthetic tests. It's a good sign for LVM. It actually shows that mo
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Duncan Thomas
wrote:
> I think there's some mileage in some further work on adding local LVM,
> since things like striping/mirroring for performace can be done. We can
> prototype it and get the numbers before even thinking about merging though
> - as additions to
I think there's some mileage in some further work on adding local LVM,
since things like striping/mirroring for performace can be done. We can
prototype it and get the numbers before even thinking about merging though
- as additions to an already fully featured driver. these seem more
worthwhile a
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
> + [sahara] because they are primary consumer of the BDD.
>
> John,
> Thanks for the answer. My comments are inline.
>
> Regards,
> Ivan Kolodyazhny,
> http://blog.e0ne.info/
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:41 PM, John Griffith
> wrote:
>
+ [sahara] because they are primary consumer of the BDD.
John,
Thanks for the answer. My comments are inline.
Regards,
Ivan Kolodyazhny,
http://blog.e0ne.info/
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:41 PM, John Griffith
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:43 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
>
>> Hi team,
>>
10 matches
Mail list logo