Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][QA] Changing logging format to match documented defaults

On 12/22/2015 01:55 PM, Ronald Bradford wrote: > Hi All, > > I have observed that devstack uses custom logging formatting that > differs from the documented defaults. An example is for nova. > > logging_context_format_string = %(asctime)s.%(msecs)03d %(levelname)s > %(name)s [%(request_id)s

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][QA] Changing logging format to match documented defaults

Ian, On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Ian Wienand wrote: > > On 12/23/2015 05:55 AM, Ronald Bradford wrote: > > I have observed that devstack uses custom logging formatting that > > differs from the documented defaults. An example is for nova. which > > is defined in [1] >

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][QA] Changing logging format to match documented defaults

Excerpts from Ronald Bradford's message of 2015-12-23 12:57:07 -0500: > Ian, > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Ian Wienand wrote: > > > > On 12/23/2015 05:55 AM, Ronald Bradford wrote: > > > I have observed that devstack uses custom logging formatting that > > > differs

[openstack-dev] [devstack][QA] Changing logging format to match documented defaults

Hi All, I have observed that devstack uses custom logging formatting that differs from the documented defaults. An example is for nova. logging_context_format_string = %(asctime)s.%(msecs)03d %(levelname)s %(name)s [%(request_id)s *%(user_name)s %(project_name)s*] %(instance)s%(message)s which

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][QA] Changing logging format to match documented defaults

Excerpts from Ian Wienand's message of 2015-12-23 07:22:39 +1100: > On 12/23/2015 05:55 AM, Ronald Bradford wrote: > > I have observed that devstack uses custom logging formatting that > > differs from the documented defaults. An example is for nova. which > > is defined in [1] > > The original

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][QA] Changing logging format to match documented defaults

On 12/23/2015 05:55 AM, Ronald Bradford wrote: > I have observed that devstack uses custom logging formatting that > differs from the documented defaults. An example is for nova. which > is defined in [1] The original point mentioned there of using "*_name" for extra verbosity still seems