Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Capacity table

2016-07-27 Thread Vitaly Kramskikh
If "new design" is the design you've proposed in the original email, then no - we'll have to reopen the bug and then revert the change again. 2016-07-27 11:36 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Dmitriev : > Hello Vitaly, > > Thank you for this answer. > The main question here is the

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Capacity table

2016-07-27 Thread Dmitry Dmitriev
Hello Vitaly, Thank you for this answer. The main question here is the business logic. Do we have to use new design or don’t. With best regards, Dmitry > On 26 Jul 2016, at 17:47, Vitaly Kramskikh wrote: > > Hi, Dmitry, > > Your design seems to be similar to one of

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Capacity table

2016-07-26 Thread Vitaly Kramskikh
Hi, Dmitry, Your design seems to be similar to one of our attempts to fix this bug: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/280737/. Though this fix was reverted, because it led to the bug with a higher priority: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1556909. So your proposed design would lead to

[openstack-dev] [fuel] Capacity table

2016-07-19 Thread Dmitry Dmitriev
Hello All! We have a very old bug about the Capacity table on the Dashboard tab of environment in Fuel: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1375750 Current design: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bxi_JFs365mBNy1WT0xQT253SWc It shows the full