Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] NodeGroups vs network-templates and static routes

2015-07-20 Thread Sergey Vasilenko
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Andrew Woodward xar...@gmail.com wrote: Regardless of computing all the routes, we need to compute same role, but multi-segement routes. In this case I see that nodegroups becomes redundant. It's only value is that it may be a simpler interface then templates

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] NodeGroups vs network-templates and static routes

2015-07-20 Thread Andrew Woodward
Ya, that makes sense now that you mention it. We will still need node groups to act as partitioning for the rack values On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:44 AM Sergey Vasilenko svasile...@mirantis.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Andrew Woodward xar...@gmail.com wrote: Regardless of

[openstack-dev] [fuel] NodeGroups vs network-templates and static routes

2015-07-16 Thread Andrew Woodward
In 6.0 we added nodegroups as part of the multiple-cluster-networks features. With these you can add additional sets of networks with so that the nodes can exist on different network segments. When these are used you will also need to set the gateway for each of your networks. When you do this,