Hey! Thanks for this update.
If you ask me about FastTrack, frankly speaking I don't care how, but I
need Glare patches be reviewed (and merged ;) ) I think we reached some
agreement on the summit, that:
1. At first we will merge only most important things, so glance images
support won't be
Hi Bob,
Thanks for reaching out!
We're in the process of finalizing the API and the team is working hard
on getting the code ready; atm with near to complete functionality WIP
patches. Please be mindful of the fact that there is currently an
experimental API in glance and code that will change
Hi Nikhil:
The Tacker project may also be interested in using Glare during
this cycle. Is there any API or other documentation/examples that we
could use to start?
Thanks
Bob
On 5/3/2016 2:40 PM, EXT Nikhil Komawar wrote:
Comment inline.
On 5/3/16 3:21 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On
I believe this model polarizes the community a bit as far as picking
reviews go.
We voted to remove it in Mitaka and I was hoping we would workout a
way to bring
the community together in the Glare reviews.
My goal is to have champions for each module that is being worked on in
Newton
Comment inline.
On 5/3/16 3:21 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> On 02/05/16 19:09 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
>
>> Added a few more tags to the subject line.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/2/16 7:05 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Just wanted to send a brief summary of the
On 02/05/16 19:09 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
Added a few more tags to the subject line.
On 5/2/16 7:05 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
Hello everyone,
Just wanted to send a brief summary of the discussions at the summit.
This list is not holistic however, it covers the relevant aspects that
Added a few more tags to the subject line.
On 5/2/16 7:05 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Just wanted to send a brief summary of the discussions at the summit.
> This list is not holistic however, it covers the relevant aspects that
> various stakeholders need to be aware of.
>
>
