On 11/29/2015 08:59 PM, Rob Cresswell (rcresswe) wrote:
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/drop-dj17
>
>
> This is where changes are currently being tracked. I don’t quite
> understand why these would be back ported; they would break Liberty with
> 1.7. Perhaps we can discuss on
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/drop-dj17
This is where changes are currently being tracked. I don’t quite
understand why these would be back ported; they would break Liberty with
1.7. Perhaps we can discuss on IRC tomorrow?
Rob
On 27/11/2015 13:58, "Thomas Goirand"
On 11/27/2015 11:18 AM, Rob Cresswell (rcresswe) wrote:
> Mitaka will support 1.9. I’m already working on it :)
> Liberty is >= 1.7 and < 1.9, so shouldn’t matter.
>
> Rob
It does mater for me, at least until the final release of Mitaka. Could
you please make sure that all of these Django 1.9
Hi,
Django 1.9 is due to be released in early December, and will reach
Debian Sid soon after that. It'd be nice to have fixes for it ASAP. I
already have bugs against some of the packages I maintain:
https://bugs.debian.org/806365
https://bugs.debian.org/806362
Any help (patches sent upstream
Mitaka will support 1.9. I’m already working on it :)
Liberty is >= 1.7 and < 1.9, so shouldn’t matter.
Rob
On 27/11/2015 09:23, "Thomas Goirand" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Django 1.9 is due to be released in early December, and will reach
>Debian Sid soon after that. It'd be nice to
On 27/11/15 10:23, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Django 1.9 is due to be released in early December, and will reach
> Debian Sid soon after that. It'd be nice to have fixes for it ASAP. I
> already have bugs against some of the packages I maintain:
I would expect upstream to go the same route