Thanks!
On 10/1/17, 8:23 PM, "Clark Boylan" wrote:
On Sun, Oct 1, 2017, at 10:19 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
> Hi,
> Is this an example of the solution that you are proposing -
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/508775/. I also read that we should
> create a .zuul.yaml file. Not s
On Sun, Oct 1, 2017, at 10:19 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
> Hi,
> Is this an example of the solution that you are proposing -
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/508775/. I also read that we should
> create a .zuul.yaml file. Not sure what the correct thing to do is.
> Please advise.
> Thanks
> Gary
>
Hi,
Is this an example of the solution that you are proposing -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/508775/. I also read that we should create a
.zuul.yaml file. Not sure what the correct thing to do is.
Please advise.
Thanks
Gary
On 10/1/17, 3:10 PM, "Clark Boylan" wrote:
On Sat, Sep 30, 201
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017, at 11:23 PM, Gary Kotton wrote:
> Hi,
> It seems like all patches are hitting this issue – “RETRY_LIMIT in 5m
> 35s”. Any idea? Is this specific to vmware-nsx or all projects?
> Did we miss doing an update for zuulv3?
>
This is specific to certain jobs. You can see general li
Hi,
It seems like all patches are hitting this issue – “RETRY_LIMIT in 5m 35s”. Any
idea? Is this specific to vmware-nsx or all projects?
Did we miss doing an update for zuulv3?
Thanks
Gary
__
OpenStack Development Mailing Lis