On 30 October 2017 at 15:16, Julia Kreger wrote:
...
>>> When I tried it I got this
>>> [ 370.704896] dracut-initqueue[387]: Warning: iscistart: Could not
>>> get list of targets from firmware.
>>>
>>> perhaps we could alter iscistart to not complain if there are no
Sorry! A little late to the discussion with how busy I was last week.
Replies/thoughts in-line with trimmed text.
>> When I tried it I got this
>> [ 370.704896] dracut-initqueue[387]: Warning: iscistart: Could not
>> get list of targets from firmware.
>>
>> perhaps we could alter iscistart to
This is a bit offtopic, but a couple of comments on BFV.
On 10/25/2017 03:55 PM, Derek Higgins wrote:
On 25 October 2017 at 13:03, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
(ooops, I somehow missed this email. sorry!)
Hi Yolanda,
On 10/16/2017 11:06 AM, Yolanda Robla Mota wrote:
Hi
On 25 October 2017 at 13:03, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> (ooops, I somehow missed this email. sorry!)
>
> Hi Yolanda,
>
> On 10/16/2017 11:06 AM, Yolanda Robla Mota wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>> Recently i've been helping some customers in the boot from ISCSI feature.
>> So far everything
> Hmm, are we talking about IPA or user images? IPA always PXE boots, no
> matter what boot_option we use. For user images with boot_option=local our
> only bet is using the ansible deploy interface, I think (please review it!)
>
User images, i'm talking about user images (specifically about
On 10/25/2017 02:15 PM, Yolanda Robla Mota wrote:
Answering inline...
Note that we only support BFV in the form of booting from a cinder volume
officially. We haven't looked into iBFV in depth.
I have been testing that on the context of booting from SAN. It is at deploy
time, in the
Answering inline...
Note that we only support BFV in the form of booting from a cinder volume
> officially. We haven't looked into iBFV in depth.
>
I have been testing that on the context of booting from SAN. It is at
deploy time, in the context of TripleO, in the undercloud. At that point no
(ooops, I somehow missed this email. sorry!)
Hi Yolanda,
On 10/16/2017 11:06 AM, Yolanda Robla Mota wrote:
Hi
Recently i've been helping some customers in the boot from ISCSI feature. So far
everything was working, but we had a problem when booting the deployment image.
It needed specifically
Hi Julia
Yes, you are right on your assumptions here. The missing feature here, is
the ability of Ironic to provide a mechanism to append standard kernel
arguments, when not netbooting. Having a way to append default parameters
to bootloader would be very useful and avoid the need of manual hacks,
Greetings Yolanda!
I guess I'm slightly not clear. In fact, I may be slightly even more
confused since we've discussed this directly. Thinking out loud, there are
two different scenarios of booting from iSCSI.
1) Human created/assigned/associated LUN off of a SAN which we want a node
to boot
Hi
Recently i've been helping some customers in the boot from ISCSI feature.
So far everything was working, but we had a problem when booting the
deployment image.
It needed specifically a flag rd.iscsi.ibft=1 rd.iscsi.firmware=1 in the
grub commands. But as the generated deployment image doesn't
11 matches
Mail list logo