Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] inclusion of openstack/networking-generic-switch project under OpenStack baremetal program

gt;>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> John >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Pavlo Shchelokovskyy [mailto:pshchelokovs...@mirantis.com] >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 14, 2017 8:16 AM >>> *To:* OpenStack Develop

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] inclusion of openstack/networking-generic-switch project under OpenStack baremetal program

ay, November 14, 2017 8:16 AM >> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < >> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> >> *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [ironic] inclusion of >> openstack/networking-generic-switch project under OpenStack baremetal >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] inclusion of openstack/networking-generic-switch project under OpenStack baremetal program

hn > > > > *From:* Pavlo Shchelokovskyy [mailto:pshchelokovs...@mirantis.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 14, 2017 8:16 AM > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [ironic] inclusion of &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] inclusion of openstack/networking-generic-switch project under OpenStack baremetal program

ubject: [openstack-dev] [ironic] inclusion of openstack/networking-generic-switch project under OpenStack baremetal program Hi all, as this topic it was recently brought up in ironic IRC meeting, I'd like to start a discussion on the subject. A quick recap - networking-generic-switch project (n-g-s) wa

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] inclusion of openstack/networking-generic-switch project under OpenStack baremetal program

Hi! Thanks for raising this. On 11/14/2017 05:16 PM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: Hi all, as this topic it was recently brought up in ironic IRC meeting, I'd like to start a discussion on the subject. A quick recap - networking-generic-switch project (n-g-s) was born out of necessity to do

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] inclusion of openstack/networking-generic-switch project under OpenStack baremetal program

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: > As a core in n-g-s myself I'm happy with either 1) or 2), but not really > fond of 3) as it kind of stretches the networking-baremetal scope too much > IMHO. Personally, I'm happy with 1 or 2. I

[openstack-dev] [ironic] inclusion of openstack/networking-generic-switch project under OpenStack baremetal program

Hi all, as this topic it was recently brought up in ironic IRC meeting, I'd like to start a discussion on the subject. A quick recap - networking-generic-switch project (n-g-s) was born out of necessity to do two things: - test the "network isolation for baremetal nodes" (a.k.a. multi-tenancy)