Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using ironic as a replacement for existing datacenter baremetal provisioning

Jim Rollenhagen wrote: 1.)Nova<-> ironic interactions are generally seem terrible? I don't know if I'd call it terrible, but there's friction. Things that are unchangable on hardware are just software configs in vms (like mac addresses, overlays, etc), and things that make no sense in VMs are

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using ironic as a replacement for existing datacenter baremetal provisioning

Hi, >> I agree in general with the idea but I think it needs a tad more >> context. We need to remember that Ironic (ex-Nova Baremetal) was >> created to fill a gap in OpenStack that was missing for TripleO >> project to get off the ground. That was the problem being solved and >> these aspects

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using ironic as a replacement for existing datacenter baremetal provisioning

Jay Pipes wrote: On 06/07/2016 02:34 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: I'll work on this list, as some folks that are trying start to try to connect ironic (IMHO without nova, because well kubernetes is enough like nova that there isn't a need for 2-layers of nova-like-systems at that point) into

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using ironic as a replacement for existing datacenter baremetal provisioning

On 06/07/2016 02:34 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: I'll work on this list, as some folks that are trying start to try to connect ironic (IMHO without nova, because well kubernetes is enough like nova that there isn't a need for 2-layers of nova-like-systems at that point) into kubernetes as a

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using ironic as a replacement for existing datacenter baremetal provisioning

On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 06:17:56PM +0100, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for writing it down Jim. > > > So, I've been thinking about this quite a bit. We've also talked about > > doing a v2 API (as evil as that may be) in Ironic here and there. We've > > had lots of lessons learned

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using ironic as a replacement for existing datacenter baremetal provisioning

Hi, Thanks for writing it down Jim. > So, I've been thinking about this quite a bit. We've also talked about > doing a v2 API (as evil as that may be) in Ironic here and there. We've > had lots of lessons learned from the v1 API, mostly that our API is > absolutely terrible for humans. I'd love

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using ironic as a replacement for existing datacenter baremetal provisioning

On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 06:17:56PM +0100, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for writing it down Jim. > > > So, I've been thinking about this quite a bit. We've also talked about > > doing a v2 API (as evil as that may be) in Ironic here and there. We've > > had lots of lessons learned

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using ironic as a replacement for existing datacenter baremetal provisioning

> >1.)Nova<-> ironic interactions are generally seem terrible? > I don't know if I'd call it terrible, but there's friction. Things that > are unchangable on hardware are just software configs in vms (like mac > addresses, overlays, etc), and things that make no sense in VMs are >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using ironic as a replacement for existing datacenter baremetal provisioning

On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:39:20AM +, Sam Betts (sambetts) wrote: > > > On 07/06/2016 23:59, "Kris G. Lindgren" > > wrote: > > Replying to a digest so sorry for the copy and pastes > > > >> There's also been discussion of ways we

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using ironic as a replacement for existing datacenter baremetal provisioning

On 07/06/2016 23:59, "Kris G. Lindgren" > wrote: Replying to a digest so sorry for the copy and pastes >> There's also been discussion of ways we could do ad-hoc changes in RAID >> level, >> based on flavor metadata, during the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using ironic as a replacement for existing datacenter baremetal provisioning

Replying to a digest so sorry for the copy and pastes…. >> There's also been discussion of ways we could do ad-hoc changes in RAID >> level, >> based on flavor metadata, during the provisioning process (rather than ahead >> of >> time) but no code has been done for this yet, AFAIK. > > I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using ironic as a replacement for existing datacenter baremetal provisioning

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016, at 02:34 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Devananda van der Veen wrote: > > On 06/07/2016 09:55 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > >> Joshua Harlow wrote: > >>> Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2016-06-07 08:46:28 -0700: > > Clint Byrum wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using ironic as a replacement for existing datacenter baremetal provisioning

Devananda van der Veen wrote: On 06/07/2016 09:55 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: Joshua Harlow wrote: Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2016-06-07 08:46:28 -0700: Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Kris G. Lindgren's message of 2016-06-06 20:44:26 +: Hi ironic folks,

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using ironic as a replacement for existing datacenter baremetal provisioning

On 06/07/2016 09:55 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Joshua Harlow wrote: >> Clint Byrum wrote: >>> Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2016-06-07 08:46:28 -0700: Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Kris G. Lindgren's message of 2016-06-06 20:44:26 +: >> Hi ironic folks, >> As

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using ironic as a replacement for existing datacenter baremetal provisioning

Joshua Harlow wrote: Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2016-06-07 08:46:28 -0700: Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Kris G. Lindgren's message of 2016-06-06 20:44:26 +: Hi ironic folks, As I'm trying to explore how GoDaddy can use ironic I've created the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using ironic as a replacement for existing datacenter baremetal provisioning

Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2016-06-07 08:46:28 -0700: Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Kris G. Lindgren's message of 2016-06-06 20:44:26 +: Hi ironic folks, As I'm trying to explore how GoDaddy can use ironic I've created the following in an attempt to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using ironic as a replacement for existing datacenter baremetal provisioning

Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2016-06-07 08:46:28 -0700: > Clint Byrum wrote: > > Excerpts from Kris G. Lindgren's message of 2016-06-06 20:44:26 +: > >> Hi ironic folks, > >> As I'm trying to explore how GoDaddy can use ironic I've created the > >> following in an attempt to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using ironic as a replacement for existing datacenter baremetal provisioning

Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Kris G. Lindgren's message of 2016-06-06 20:44:26 +: Hi ironic folks, As I'm trying to explore how GoDaddy can use ironic I've created the following in an attempt to document some of my concerns, and I'm wondering if you folks could help myself identity

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using ironic as a replacement for existing datacenter baremetal provisioning

On 06/07/2016 02:01 AM, Devananda van der Veen wrote: On 06/06/2016 01:44 PM, Kris G. Lindgren wrote: Hi ironic folks, As I'm trying to explore how GoDaddy can use ironic I've created the following in an attempt to document some of my concerns, and I'm wondering if you folks could help myself

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using ironic as a replacement for existing datacenter baremetal provisioning

Thanks for getting to this before me, Deva. Saved me some typing. :) A little more color inline. On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 05:01:04PM -0700, Devananda van der Veen wrote: > > On 06/06/2016 01:44 PM, Kris G. Lindgren wrote: > > Hi ironic folks, > > As I'm trying to explore how GoDaddy can use

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using ironic as a replacement for existing datacenter baremetal provisioning

On 06/06/2016 01:44 PM, Kris G. Lindgren wrote: > Hi ironic folks, > As I'm trying to explore how GoDaddy can use ironic I've created the following > in an attempt to document some of my concerns, and I'm wondering if you folks > could help myself identity ongoing work to solve these (or

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using ironic as a replacement for existing datacenter baremetal provisioning

Excerpts from Kris G. Lindgren's message of 2016-06-06 20:44:26 +: > Hi ironic folks, > As I'm trying to explore how GoDaddy can use ironic I've created the > following in an attempt to document some of my concerns, and I'm wondering if > you folks could help myself identity ongoing work to

[openstack-dev] [ironic] using ironic as a replacement for existing datacenter baremetal provisioning

Hi ironic folks, As I'm trying to explore how GoDaddy can use ironic I've created the following in an attempt to document some of my concerns, and I'm wondering if you folks could help myself identity ongoing work to solve these (or alternatives?) List of concerns with ironic: 1.)Nova <->