Hello,
I have just tried the new "specs" proposal. Hope it is not too bad (maybe the
text could be better but
english is not my language) :)
I have also included some of you involved with federations as reviewers.
Cheers,
Marco
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 09:15:31AM -0500, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Marco Fargetta
wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 07:39:01AM -0500, Dolph Mathews wrote:
> > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Marco Fargetta
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > >
> > > > • Federated Keystone and Horizon
> > > > □ Completely open-ended, the
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 07:39:01AM -0500, Dolph Mathews wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Marco Fargetta
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> >
> > > • Federated Keystone and Horizon
> > > □ Completely open-ended, there isn't much an expectation that we
> > deliver
> > > this in Ju
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Marco Fargetta
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
> > • Federated Keystone and Horizon
> > □ Completely open-ended, there isn't much an expectation that we
> deliver
> > this in Juno, but it's something we should start thinking about.
> > □
>
> I have just
Hi All,
> • Federated Keystone and Horizon
> □ Completely open-ended, there isn't much an expectation that we deliver
> this in Juno, but it's something we should start thinking about.
> □
I have just registered a new blueprint for this point:
https://blueprints.launchpad
Hey Everyone,
I've received a couple emails from folks
interested in federation for Keystone, ranging from testing federation
to fix bugs and implement blueprints.
I've been keeping a list of Federation
specific work items for Keystone, I've tried to attach names to some of
the items that have al
