Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 8:43:08 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova] Re: Hierarchicical
Multitenancy Discussion
On Feb 5, 2014, at 3:38 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com wrote
Hi Vish,
I’m jumping in slightly late on this, but I also have an interest in this. I’m
going to preface this by saying that I have not read this whole thread yet, so
I apologize if I repeat things, say anything that is addressed by previous
posts, or doesn’t jive with what you’re looking
@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Monday, February 3, 2014 10:58:28 PM
Subject: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova] Re: Hierarchicical Multitenancy
Discussion
Hello Again!
At the meeting last week we discussed some options around getting true
multitenancy in nova. The use case that we are trying to support can
: quarta-feira, 5 de fevereiro de 2014 08:38
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova] Re: Hierarchicical Multitenancy
Discussion
Hi Vish,
You're approach looks very interesting. I especially like the idea of 'walking
the tree
Flament
- Original Message -
From: Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Monday, February 3, 2014 10:58:28 PM
Subject: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova] Re: Hierarchicical
On Feb 5, 2014, at 12:27 AM, Chris Behrens cbehr...@codestud.com wrote:
Hi Vish,
I’m jumping in slightly late on this, but I also have an interest in this.
I’m going to preface this by saying that I have not read this whole thread
yet, so I apologize if I repeat things, say anything
vishvana...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Monday, February 3, 2014 10:58:28 PM
Subject: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova] Re: Hierarchicical Multitenancy
Discussion
Hello Again!
At the meeting last week we
,
Arvind
-Original Message-
From: Chris Behrens [mailto:cbehr...@codestud.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 1:27 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova] Re: Hierarchicical Multitenancy
Discussion
Hi Vish,
I'm
[mailto:cbehr...@codestud.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 1:27 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova] Re: Hierarchicical Multitenancy
Discussion
Hi Vish,
I'm jumping in slightly late on this, but I also have
On Feb 5, 2014, at 3:38 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 5, 2014, at 12:27 AM, Chris Behrens cbehr...@codestud.com wrote:
1) domain ‘a’ cannot see instances (or resources in general) in domain ‘b’.
It doesn’t matter if domain ‘a’ and domain ‘b’ share the same
[mailto:vishvana...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 2:58 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova] Re: Hierarchicical Multitenancy
Discussion
Hello Again!
At the meeting last week we discussed some options around getting true
Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova] Re: Hierarchicical Multitenancy
Discussion
Hello Again!
At the meeting last week we discussed some options around getting true
multitenancy in nova. The use case that we are trying to support can
Yes this is one approach if keystone really wants to extend domains to work
this way, but I think this is more complex than just using nested projects.
Having domains contain domains containing projects is less intuitive than
projects all the way down.
It's worth mentioning that at the
Hello Again!
At the meeting last week we discussed some options around getting true
multitenancy in nova. The use case that we are trying to support can be
described as follows:
Martha, the owner of ProductionIT provides it services to multiple Enterprise
clients. She would like to offer
14 matches
Mail list logo