On 12/11/2017 07:08 PM, Adam Heczko wrote:
> Thanks Lance for a comprehensive summary.
> However I'm bit puzzled with application credentials spec,
> specifically with the sentence 'This model, while convenient for keystone,
> increases the risk of account compromise by requiring the
Thanks Lance for a comprehensive summary.
However I'm bit puzzled with application credentials spec, specifically
with the sentence 'This model, while convenient for keystone,
increases the risk of account compromise by requiring the distribution of
unencrypted passwords.'
My personal preference
Sending out a gentle reminder that feature proposal freeze will be next
week. It looks like all possible features are in flight based on the
current state of the specs repository. The only exception is the unified
limit specification, which was rebased and passing today [0].
Thanks!
[0]
Sending out a reminder that we have a couple deadlines approaching.
First, *specification* *freeze* is *two weeks away*. Here is a short
list of things we've committed to but need the specification to merge:
- Unified Limits API [0]
- Application Credentials [1]
- System Scope [2]
- Scope Types
