.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Friday, March 25, 2016 at 8:36 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote
+1
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1 for sure
> >>
> >> -Ryan
> >>
> >> - Original Message -
> >> From: "Paul Bourke" <paul.bou...@oracle.com>
> >> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> >> Sent
om: "Paul Bourke" <paul.bou...@oracle.com>
>> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 11:43:06 AM
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] deprecation of
>> icehosue/juno/kilo branches
>>
>> +1
>>
>> O
2016 11:43:06 AM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] deprecation of
> icehosue/juno/kilo branches
>
> +1
>
> On 25/03/16 15:36, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > These branches are essentially unmaintained and we have completely given
>
+1 for sure
-Ryan
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Bourke" <paul.bou...@oracle.com>
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 11:43:06 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] deprecation of icehosue/juno/kilo
branches
+1
On 25/03/16 15
+1
On 25/03/16 15:36, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
Hey folks,
These branches are essentially unmaintained and we have completely given
up on them. That’s ok – they were paths of our development. I didn't
really want to branch them in the first place, but the community
demanded it, so I
Hey folks,
These branches are essentially unmaintained and we have completely given up on
them. That's ok - they were paths of our development. I didn't really want to
branch them in the first place, but the community demanded it, so I delivered
that :)
Now that our architecture is fairly
