Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Multi-tenancy and ceilometer triggers

2014-07-13 Thread Ray Chen
Hi Augus, I agree with that 'trigger' should not be put in workbook. in current implement, it's hard to get the execution context while schedule trigger. Here is one bug to complain about missing context. https://bugs.launchpad.net/mistral/+bug/1335758 Thanks, Ray On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:59

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Multi-tenancy and ceilometer triggers

2014-06-10 Thread Angus Salkeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi I was looking at https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-ceilometer-integration and trying to figure out how to implement that. I can see some problems: - - at the moment the trust is created when you PUT the workbook definition