On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 08:40:28AM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10 2018, Tony Breeds wrote:
>
> > It looks like in August this was already setup
> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/591682/
> > So releases going forward will be on pypi.
> >
> > Julien, Do you mind me arranging for
On Mon, Sep 10 2018, Tony Breeds wrote:
> It looks like in August this was already setup
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/591682/
> So releases going forward will be on pypi.
>
> Julien, Do you mind me arranging for at least the following versions to
> be published to pypi?
>
> [tony@thor
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 11:02:06AM +1000, Ian Wienand wrote:
> On 09/10/2018 09:39 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> > Julien, Do you mind me arranging for at least the following versions to
> > be published to pypi?
>
> For this particular case, I think our best approach is to have an
> admin manually
On 09/10/2018 09:39 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
Julien, Do you mind me arranging for at least the following versions to
be published to pypi?
For this particular case, I think our best approach is to have an
admin manually upload the tar & wheels from tarballs.openstack.org to
pypi. All other
On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 03:21:38PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 11:09:15AM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
>
> > You can, I've already said +1 on a review a few weeks ago. :)
>
> Oh great. I'll dig that up and push forward with that side of things if
> you don't mind.
It
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 11:09:15AM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> You can, I've already said +1 on a review a few weeks ago. :)
Oh great. I'll dig that up and push forward with that side of things if
you don't mind.
Yours Tony.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 18-09-07 11:09:15, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07 2018, Tony Breeds wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 01:33:12PM +0300, Michel Peterson wrote:
> >
> >> I remember that before landing the problematic patch [1] there was some
> >> discussion around it. Basically the problem was not
On Fri, Sep 07 2018, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 01:33:12PM +0300, Michel Peterson wrote:
>
>> I remember that before landing the problematic patch [1] there was some
>> discussion around it. Basically the problem was not n-odl but ceilometer
>> not being in pypi, but we never
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 01:33:12PM +0300, Michel Peterson wrote:
> I remember that before landing the problematic patch [1] there was some
> discussion around it. Basically the problem was not n-odl but ceilometer
> not being in pypi, but we never foresaw this problem.
>
> Now that the problem
